My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0621_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0621_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:54:54 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:42:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rationale Behind Land Uses <br />Shown on Previous Concept <br />Alternatives <br />Rationale behind the land uses shown <br />on the alternatives at the last workshop <br />. The Developer has been consistent in statingthat they <br />cannot make these commitments without an economic <br />engine. They believe that Costco would be their preferred <br />engine <br />• Costco is unique among'big bo�C' retail uses in that they wil <br />utilize a comer entrance location which allows for <br />signi�icaMly smaller parking bays (in direct response to <br />panel input) <br />. If there is no support for an element that the Development <br />Team believes to be essential and criticalto their w�an�, <br />this process should establish that conflict, not gloss over R. <br />Summary of Panel Comments <br />on ConceptAlternatives <br />Rationale behind the land uses shown <br />on the alternatives at the lastworkshop <br />• The purpose of the process is to engage the Development <br />Team and the Advisory Panel in an attempt to identiTy a <br />concept plan that could proceed into a PUD applicatlon,with <br />communiiy support <br />. It is the Development Team who must deadethat they are <br />oon derit enough in the development proposal to make all <br />of the necessary legal and financialcommitmentsthrough <br />the redevelopment agreement, assessmerit agreement, <br />PUD agreement, eta <br />Given the significanceaF the currerit <br />financial gap it was not believed to be <br />useful to prepare altemativesthat included <br />us�s that would not contribute taxes <br />(community center), or uses for which no <br />demand has been identified <br />(hotel/conference center) <br />�K�, <br />Comments: Conceptl <br />�,._ . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.