My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_0726_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_0726_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 3:34:23 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:43:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Study Session — 07/19/04 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 4 <br />other area of Roseville. Mr. Goodman recognized that <br />there was a question of Roselawn Cemetery regarding their <br />civil liberties versus the City's responsibility and authority <br />to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. Mr. <br />Goodman further noted that, regardless of the outcome of <br />the Cemetery's appeal through the court system, the RNRG <br />was asking the City Council to consider amending their <br />zoning ordinance at this time. <br />Mayor Klausing recognized the request of the RNRG, <br />noting that the City Council would not be taking formal <br />action at tonight's meeting, and a formal request of the <br />RNRG could be taken under advisement, pending <br />consultation with the City's Attorney to determine <br />ramifications to the City while litigation was pending <br />between the City and Roseville Cemetery. <br />Mr. Goodman opined that the City had the legal right to <br />change rules at this time, and advised that his firm had <br />provided specific case law to the City Attorney for their <br />review. <br />City Attorney Eric Hedtke confirmed that the case law had <br />been provided to the City Attorney's office for review, but <br />that their staff was also researching additional information <br />and ramifications to the City's strategy on appeal, and <br />whether the case law presented could be deemed arbitrary <br />and capricious. <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Mr. Hedtke's <br />recommended course of action and forthcoming legal <br />opinion on the matter, in addition to discussions and an <br />opinion from the City's League of Minnesota Cities <br />Insurance Trust (LMCIT) Attorney George Hoff, who is <br />handling the litigation for the City. <br />Mr. Hedtke sought direction from the City Council as to <br />whether they were requesting a written legal opinion; with <br />Councilmembers concurring that a written legal opinion be <br />provided for discussion at a later meeting, whether in <br />Executive Session or at an open public meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.