My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004_1115_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2004
>
2004_1115_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 2:56:55 PM
Creation date
12/14/2009 1:45:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Thelma McKenzie [ <br />Sent: Friday, November 05,20044:39 PM <br />To: neal.beets cLDci.roseville.mn.us <br />Subject: RE: Citizen Advisory Commission Survey <br />To Neal Beets <br />From Thelma McECenzie <br />Below are my answers in caps for you convenience in reading. Thanks, Thelma <br />Members of Roseville's Citizen Advisory Commissions: <br />The City Council has specifically asked for your input on questions relating to <br />Roseville's Citizen Advisory Commissions. <br />The Council is looking at such issues as the size, term lengths, term limits, and mission <br />of its citizen advisory boards. Attached as background information are the Council- <br />approved minutes from the October llth Council Study Session where the Council discussed <br />these issues. Also attached is the staff report for that meeting that analyzes these <br />issues. <br />The questions the Council would like your feedback on follow. Please indicate your <br />choices by replying to this e-mail and include whatever explanation or feedback you wish. <br />PLEASE REPLY TO THIS E-MAIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5TH. <br />THAT IS A WEEK FROM TOMORROW. <br />Staff will then share your input verbatim with the City Council and, through the Council�s <br />agenda packet, with the rest of the community. <br />With the benefit of your feedback, the Council is looking at addressing these issues again <br />at their Monday, November 15th Study Session in the Council Chambers. <br />l. Do you think the size of your citizen advisory commission is <br />a. About Right? <br />b. Too Large? <br />c. Too Small? <br />Explanation, if you wish, about your choice above: <br />I THINK THE SIZE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION IS ABOUT RIGHT. (A) <br />2. Do you think the length of your term is <br />a. About Right? <br />b. Too Long? <br />c. Too Short? <br />Explanation, if you wish, about your choice above: <br />Again, (A) In my experience I have found the length of term to be a good period of time. <br />3. Do you agree with a limit of two terms? <br />Or would you prefer no term limit? <br />Or would you prefer some term limit greater than two terms? Explanation, if you wish: <br />ANSWER <br />I do not agree with a limit of two terms. A term greater that two terms is preferable. <br />If two-tterm limits were implemented someone like me would no longer be serving, it takes <br />time to get programs up and running, to share concrete ideas and move them into action to <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.