Laserfiche WebLink
2005 Preliminary Budget <br />The proposed 2005 Budget and Tax levy was initially submitted for consideration in July. A <br />Preliminary Budget was adopted by the Council on Septembler 13, 2004. Since that time, the <br />Council has held a number of budget meetings whereby they agreed to modify the Preliminary <br />Budget. Given that the Council has not yet made any fmal decisions, and to ensure continuity <br />throughout tonight's TNT Hearing, these modifications have nlot yet been included in the figures <br />presented below. <br />The Preliminary 2005 Budget, approved in September of this pear, is $32,923,530(a), a decrease <br />of $2,068,880 or 5.9°/o. The decrease is ]arg�3}� at�i��ta�l� r.a #1� completion of the City Hall <br />renovation and �th�� ca�ital irnpE���m�rrts f�r wh«h or��-4imc m�ni es were used, and are no <br />longer needed. The �rttbin�d b�dig�l f�r �h� ta�c-�u�r��d �u�� i� $]�,���,���, an increase of <br />$106,605 or 0.8%. <br />(a) The resolution adopting the 2005 Proposed Budget includec �TM amount of $33,323,530. The <br />correct amount should have been $32,923,530 ($400,000 less) �`i will be reflected in the final <br />Budgetresolution. The resolution adopting the Proposed Tax Le� was not affected. <br />The budgeted increase in the tax-supported funds is affected by a variety of factors which <br />include, but are not limited to: <br />a) $200,000 increase for inflationary impacts <br />b) $125,000 increase for added vehicle replacement chargAs <br />c) $25,000 increase for the City's share of gym rental an�� operating costs at the Gymnastics <br />Center <br />These added costs were partially offset by the elimination of f�andin� for a custodial position, one <br />maintenance position, and one FTE civilian position �i�k��� � Police Department. The <br />eliminationof these positions is incorporatedinto the Prelimiru�y I�ud���. <br />Tax Levy and Tax Impact <br />The proposed tax levy for 2005 is $10,761,015, an in�r�a�e of $1,000,341 or 103%. The <br />increase is largely attributable to the spending ir�E�a�� n�t�d above, as well as the loss in state- <br />aid of $500,000 (from a total of $700,000) that Y�ad ��4 �a b� �nc.c�r�r$�.ad into the budget. <br />With the proposed tax levy and estimated increases in the ity's tax base, an average-valued <br />home of $175,000 would see an increase of $19 or 4.7% in th ir local property taxes (holding all <br />other factors constant). Assuming this same home experienoes a]�% valuation increase, the <br />local property tax increase would be $63 or 15.1% in their ]�1 pEOpert�r taxes (holding all other <br />factors constant). <br />� <br />