2000_0313_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5.0 PUBLICHEARING COMMENTS 5,1 On February 9, 2000, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Midland Hills request. At the hearing> a number of adjacent residents addressed the Commission regarding the proposed redevelopment project. Most of the residents spoke regarding concern regarding potential impact the new clubhouse would have on their homes and the neighborhood. 5.2 Mr. Glen Morey had concerns with the 10% expansion threshold (since eliminated) and that there was not a final landscape and grading plan. Staff responded by indicating the code allows the 10% change administratively> but the Commission could stipulate a different requirement in the CUP. Staff also indicated the landscape and grading plan were working documents> continually being revised to address resident and staff comments/concerns. 5,3 Mr. David Mueller questioned the notification process and indicated a sign directing members and guests to the Club should be located on Cleveland Avenue. 5.4 Ms. Cathy Croughan asked about storm water piping and potential for removal of existing vegetative cover and that the berm be extended south and include additional conifer trees to further screen her from the parking lot and building. 5, 5 Mr. Joe Olsen indicated a concern with the proposed structure not being compatible with the adjacent residential properties. He also expressed a concern over the banquet room> its location> additional activity> and additional noise due to the location being closer to the adjacent residential properties. Mr. Olsen also expressed interest in a condition restricting the use of outdoor audio systems. 5.6 Mr. Ed Sucoff expressed concern with the size of the structure and indicated he felt it was too large for a suburban site. He proposed conditions be placed on the project that required the landscape and parking lot lighting plans be approved by the City Council; that no access be allowed to Midland Hills Road or Rosewood Lane; that a noise impact study should be completed and an abatement plan created for the parking lot and patio areas; and that the Commission postpone consideration until final plans are complete. 5.7 Mr. Erli Chan expressed concern over the structure location> the buffer> and the administrative approval of a 10% change. 6.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 6,1 On February 9, 2000, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Midland Hills request. The Planning Commission reviewed the findings and following the public hearing> the Planning Commission voted (6-0) PF3178 — RCA (031300) Page 9 of 10