2000_1218_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

B. Sections 1005.04, Retail Business District (B-2), 1005.05, General Business District (B-3), 1007.02, Light Industrial District (I-1), and 1007.03, General Industrial District (I-2), subsection "A" (Permitted Uses) would be amended to include a bingo hall but in the B2 District, and indirectiv the SC District, staff is nrouosins an amendment to address Pastor Carlson and �revious Council concern regarding the location of a bin�o hall near churches, schools, and residential districts. The proposed amendment would subiect a bingo hall to the 1,500 foot senaration reauirement in Section 303.04. C. By reference the Shopping Center District (SC) incorporates all permitted and conditional uses within the Retail Business District (B-2). 3.2 Staff has reviewed the proposal considered by the City Council on November 27, 2000, and concludes that it is appropriate to allow a bingo hall as a conditional use in the B-1 and B- 1 B zoning districts for the following reasons: . Zone is neighborhood oriented and requires a greater level of site control and compatibility with residential uses. . A bingo hall is a clean quiet business. . Has an off-peak parking requirement. . Restricted hours of operation must be compatible with neighborhood. 3.3 Staff has also concluded that it is appropriate to allow bingo as a permitted use within the B-2, B-3, SC, I-1, and I-2 Zoning districts for the following reasons: . Is a similar use to retail (B-3) . Parking is generally available at off-peak times and normally can be shares. . Public infrastructure is in place and can easily support the surge traffic. . Hours of operation will trigger 24-hour service use regulations in SC district. 3.4 The standard requirements for items such as off-street parking, building/parking setbacks, landscaping, and other requirements would apply to the bingo hall and the zoning district in which it is proposed. However, in the B-1 and B-1B districts a greater level of site control may be necessary to mitigate impacts to any adj acent residential zone or use. 4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION 4.1 It is recommended that the Roseville City Council consider the proposed modifications as identified in the attached ordinance. 5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION 5.1 On Wednesday, December 13, the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding amendments to Sections 1004, 1005, and 1007 of the Roseville City Code. PF3278 — RCA (121800) Page 2 of 3