pm_030409 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, March 04, 2009 Page 5 need to accommodate snow storage on site, while expressing willingness to work with staff on potential parking design to accommodate more green space. Further discussion included adjustable lighting heights for less impact to adjoining properties; typical accessibility points above and beyond code requirements; and location of bicycle parking amenities near the north entrance to the building. Eric Beazley, Loucks & Associates, Civil Engineer for the Project Mr. Beazley addressed traffic considerations, based on discussions with Ramsey County and the critical nature of the County Road B and Lexington Avenue intersection for Ramsey County, and addressing traffic flow at that intersection. Mr. Beazley addressed City standards for Sandhurst as related to access points. City Engineer Debra Bloom Ms. Bloom addressed staff’s considerations when reviewing circulation on the site and access points, and anticipated enhancements in traffic flow by moving the access point further away from the intersection. Ms. Bloom opined that the Sandhurst traffic situation should also improve with the new use and site access points. Gonsalo Villares, Pope Architects Mr. Villares addressed the traffic light pole location, and willingness to address landscaping to make access easier for pedestrians and bicycles; location of bike racks by the entrance; and pedestrian connections between the building entrance and sidewalk. Mr. Villares addressed the building height in relationship to the neighboring buildings, with standard heights at sixteen feet (16’) for the building, along with an additional two feet (2’) amenity on the corner for emphasis, and offered to review heights of neighboring buildings in more detail. Chair Bakeman opened the meeting for public comment at approximately 7:55 p.m. Public Comment Andrejs Vape, Owner of Lexington Court Apartments, 2192 – 2206 Lexington Mr. Vape expressed concern about losing the residential nature of the neighborhood; in addition to traffic concerns and the number of accidents currently at the corner of County Road B and Lexington Avenue. Mr. Vape further opined that making a left-hand turn from either of the two (2) accesses to his apartment buildings was very difficult; and noted the huge traffic issue at Sandhurst and Lexington. Mr. Vape opined that it would irresponsible to compromise on the forty foot (40’) visibility triangle, and that it would only create more problems and accidents. Mr. Vape further opined that the code shouldn’t be changed for setback requirements; and that additional green space and landscaping should be added. Mr. Vape further opined that, while this will be an improvement over the current drive-thru bank, it should be done right and that the building should not be located directly up to the sidewalk. Tom Arnold, representing his daughter, Heidi Arnold, resident at 1133 Sandhurst Mr. Arnold provided his observations from frequent visits to his daughter’s home; and opined about the need to remember that the quality of life in Roseville was based on it being a suburb, and that urban features were not called for. Mr. Arnold opined that there were vacant buildings all over the City, and with the current economy, no more office buildings were indicated. Mr. Arnold further opined that the existing well-established and stable neighborhood should be preserved, and that the addition of an office building in the neighborhood would reduce residential property values. Mr. Arnold suggested that the applicant only go one (1) lot deep, not two (2) to avoid infringing upon the residential neighborhood. Mr. Arnold suggested that the City not encourage further chaotic planning with past patterns of mixing business and residential properties. Mr. Arnold recommended that the City do more planning to avoid further chaos; and agreed that traffic was atrocious.