My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0301S
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0301S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2010 11:20:38 AM
Creation date
3/12/2010 11:20:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/1/2010
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March O1, 2010 <br />Page 3 <br />12. Business Items (Action Items) <br />13. Business Items - Presentations/Discussions <br />a. Discuss Strategic Planning with the Administration, Fire and Police Depart- <br />ments <br />Mayor Klausing stated that the purpose of tonight's special meeting was for De- <br />partment heads to provide their comments to the City Council regarding goals and <br />strategies for, as well as challenges specific to their department, in order to pro- <br />vide abetter dialogue in preparation for the 2011 Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO) <br />process and prioritizing tax-supported programs. <br />By way of introduction, City Manager Bill Malinen advised that each department <br />had utilized the Action Steps categorized from the Imagine Roseville 2025 com- <br />munity visioning process and City Council-established priorities for its implemen- <br />tation, providing a status report based on three areas: those items done, those <br />items ongoing and those not yet completed. Mr. Malinen advised that further <br />comparisons were referenced in the 160 priority items identified in the 2010 BFO <br />listings; Capital Investment Plan (CIP); and also based on challenges specific to <br />each department from the Department Heads' perspectives to allow the City <br />Council to have a broader understanding of day-to-day City operations. <br />1. Administration Department <br />City Manager Malinen reviewed the Administration Department and those <br />categories, noting that the most significant challenge for the department <br />was that most of the action steps had relatively short timelines within a 1-3 <br />year period, making it difficult to position them all for accomplishment in <br />conjunction with Council identified priorities. <br />At the request of Councilmember Johnson, Mr. Malinen advised that the <br />Finance Department was separate from the Administration Department <br />and would be scheduled along with other departments at upcoming City <br />Council meetings; and confirmed that City Council activities and budget <br />was part of Administration, rather than Finance. <br />Councilmember Pust sought an explanation of what was included in citi- <br />zen recognition programs at City Council meetings (Ongoing: 1.a.7.b). <br />Mr. Malinen advised that this included specific recognition programs for <br />individuals contributing to the community (i.e., retiring Advisory Com- <br />missioners) and others for their achievements on behalf of the community. <br />Councilmember Pust asked, in the day-to-day management of the Admin- <br />istration Department, how Mr. Malinen used the Imagine Roseville 2025 <br />as a planning document, if it was used; and if he performed regular evalua- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.