Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />Roseville Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Work Session <br />DRAFT Summary Notes — Wednesday, July 08, 2009 <br />Page 2 <br />cept of the HRA building housing not for low-income, but moderate-income households wishing to <br />stay in Roseville, but currently unable to afford to do so. <br />Members reaffirmed Goal I. To provide a balance of housing in price and product type to <br />meet life cycle needs of the community. <br />Policies as stated were revised as follows: <br />b) Support, �initiate] and promote alternate housing for seniors... <br />d) Develop and promote programs that provide fro a range of housing <br />residents within the City... <br />Additional Policv: <br />e) Intergenerational housing <br />for all �diverse] <br />Further discussion included preliminary statistics from the currer�:�arket s �ndicating and <br />supporting the missing rental housing link for moderate-inc��e levels, for t ouseholds <br />above poverty level between $18,000 — 35,000 for a house `�"" of one (1); wheth at missing <br />income strata is limited to seniors and limited availability ental units for that income level due <br />to the age and deterioration of that particular price-ra unit; " of reinvestment by owners <br />diminishing the quality of their buildings (i.e., Har M artme rior to their rehabilitation); and <br />��� <br />service components tied to age-restricted buildings .„ <br />Additional discussion included recognition in the Compre <br />tional housing; need to connect to, facilitate, and provide a <br />gic Plan and Comprehensive Plan; an , senior coo <br />serve moderate income levels, be self- p T���° �c <br />uity. Potential funding and/or ownersh artner s <br />could initiate or participate; as well as �at�a�;r��rket versus <br />margins for developers. F <br />a��,-t <br />e Plan of the need for intergenera- <br />rching goal for the HRA Strate- <br />tive housing options that would <br />e affordable options by limiting eq- <br />were discussed in which the HRA <br />HRA involvement, based on profit <br />Discussion focused on 'rty rental ar,t� condominium options currently available within the <br />community and the ation k ctor and i me levels they addressed; housing issues for sen- <br />iors in their abilit " finan$�, ",��r ma�� ing current single-family homes in addition to cost <br />considerations equity; �FfIJQ ��;�t'on 202 options based on Member Elkins' affiliation with <br />such a buildin �° � apl d, limitation for awards per state per annum, and red tape in man- <br />agement and nu�ri� � ubsidized units. <br />Mem aff di '"� d the preference for specifically integrating the goals of the Compre- <br />he, a the Ha rategic Plan and prioritizing them; or providing for an overall general <br />link the <br />fter discussion <br />Li <br />documents. <br />mbers concurred that a new goal should be created linking the documents. <br />Strategic Plan to the Comprehensive Plan <br />Members reaffirmed Goal II. To see that funding sources are explored and well managed <br />in order to provide housing options fro residents within the City of Roseville. <br />Goal Statement revised to read: <br />"To see that funding sources are �available] and well-+x�a�ed � known] ... <br />