Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, January 20, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br />$125, which served to offset rental for the facility for the day. Ms. Kelsey noted that the <br />brochures were completed, with maps prepared. Ms. Kelsey suggested that more non-profits <br />be approached for next year’s fair to determine their interest in being involved. <br />Ms. Kelsey advised that final updates would be provided at the next meeting; and that staff <br />was presenting to the City Council at their January 26, 2009 meeting. Ms. Kelsey advised that <br />City Manager Malinen was donating his time for the day to assist. Ms. Kelsey noted that this <br />was really a community effort; and noted the many volunteers who did so annually, and <br />without them the event could not happen. Ms. Kelsey advised that they were planning a <br />special recognition for a minimum of two (2) volunteers who had done so for over thirteen (13) <br />years to-date at this event. <br />a.Update on Housing Improvement Area (HIA) – Westwood Village I <br />Ms. Kelsey updated members on establishment of this HIA, originally requested three (3) <br />years ago; and approved by the City Council in September of 2008. Ms. Kelsey noted the <br />work completed by the townhome association in updating their by-laws, providing cost <br />analyses and allocation of assessment costs, and establishing a financial plan for future <br />reserves to address maintenance issues. Ms. Kelsey advised that the assessment allocations <br />would go before the City Council at their January 26, 2009 meeting. Ms. Kelsey advised that <br />the assessments included a twenty percent (20%) contingency fee to allow for unknowns. <br />Member Pust suggested that if HRA members or members of the public have strong views or <br />comments, that they talk to the City Council. Ms. Pust noted that there were several ways to <br />look at this situation, and that requests for additional information indicated there were <br />questions yet unresolved. <br /> Ms. Kelsey addressed some of the specifics of the request; per unit assessment realities and <br />limited budgets of some of the owners; and confusion of some residents. <br /> Member Tracy requested review of the HIA program and ordinance, including the financing <br />through Bremer Bank; interest rates plus fees for City administration of the financing; fifteen <br />(15) year term of the loan; lack of availability for private financing on a number of the units; <br />and assessment of the costs, as a guarantee for payback or a lien on the tax rolls with first place <br />for payback upon resale. Ms. Kelsey advised that the loan term was 15 years, at 6.75 – 7.25% <br />interest, in addition a 1.5% City fee. <br /> Discussion included steps taken by the association to ensure they did not end up without <br />sufficient reserves for future improvements, by providing an average increase of $200/month <br />in association dues; creation of a budget plan for the future that had been reviewed and <br />approved by the City’s Finance Director Chris Miller; and protection to the City from any <br />additional debt issues, with the City serving as a pass through and administrator. <br /> Member Pust noted that the City Council may need to discuss policy issues from their <br />perspective to address their criteria for providing this assistance in case other associations <br />expressed interest in similar financing; did the City wish to serve as a bank repeatedly; and <br />how best to address the strife created in the Westwood Village community related to the cost <br />allocations for improvements, which had grown contentious. <br /> Further discussion included other communities having experience with HIA’s (Hopkins and St. <br />Louise Park); additional information provided by Member Masche on this subject; the <br />uniqueness of this request for 100% of construction costs, rather than gap financing; and <br />inability to determine if any individual units are close to foreclosure until they actually go into <br />foreclosure. <br />Additional discussion included the HRA’s standards going forward and whether they were <br />interested in doing so again; informal staff surveys to determine if other similar situations were <br /> <br />