Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Trudgeon recognized the annual challenges in presenting responsible budgets to provide <br />  <br />services valued and requested by residents, and in light of ever-increasing employee health <br /> <br /> <br />care and benefit costs. <br />  <br /> <br />Chair Maschka noted various components of the strategic plan and their dollar figures (i.e., <br /> <br />multi-family loan program; work force down payment assistance); and if these concepts were <br /> <br />not immediately feasible, whether the City Council would consider allowing the HRA to <br /> <br />utilize its bonding authority to fund such initiatives. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Member Pust opined that this would be a valuable discussion, and that consideration needed to <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />be given to other deflators (i.e., cost of government), as well as financial and political <br /> <br />  <br />considerations. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />  <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that the rationale for updating the strategic plan was that many of the <br /> <br /> <br />older programs had been completed, or were no longer relevant, and it was evident that other <br /> <br /> <br />segments of the community needed to be reached, but that such elements came with an <br /> <br /> <br />additional cost. Mr. Trudgeon opined that the HRA could attempt to maintain the status quo, <br /> <br /> <br />and not provide any additional innovations; however, staff did not think they would be <br /> <br /> <br />adequately doing their jobs or sufficiently providing support to the HRA and needs of the <br /> <br /> <br />community. <br /> <br /> <br />  <br />Further discussion included whether budget reductions were preferable across the board or by <br /> <br /> <br />deleting or deferring specific programs; determination of those programs having the most <br />  <br />impact for the community, and having the highest priority versus those with more discretion; <br />  <br />public support of the Neighborhood Enhancement Program, and progress to-date; and how to <br />  <br />identify which tools to eliminate or reduce based on the issues currently before the HRA. Mr. <br />  <br />Trudgeon noted those programs proposed that may reduce future costs and community impacts <br />  <br />through their immediate implementation (i.e., multi-family program at $250,000); and <br />  <br />potentially phasing for some new programs until they become self-sustaining as revolving loan <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />programs. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />  <br />Additional discussion included clarifying current budget requests with those funds already <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />established but not represented on line item annual budgets (i.e., revolving loan programs); <br /> <br />  <br />how to ensure public transparency in the budget; clarifying budget line items versus fund <br /> <br /> <br />balances based on annual budget requests as opposed to funds being continually replenished <br /> <br /> <br />through the various revolving loan programs to keep them self-sustaining; and the need for the <br /> <br /> <br />HRA to make a choice in how to provide resources for its program priorities. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion related to the Har Mar Apartment project and funding sources, including restricted <br /> <br /> <br />funds from Ramsey County provided in the HRA quarterly finance update and setting-aside of <br /> <br /> <br />those funds over the last three (3) years for use specific to this project and represented as part <br />  <br />of the $367,000 carryover ($100,000 carryover for the last three years) for this project. <br /> <br /> <br />  <br />Ms. Kelsey provided an example of the HRA levy funding single-family loans several years <br />  <br />ago as the program became self-sustaining through funds generated from loan paybacks, with <br />  <br />approximately $200,000 currently in that fund. <br />  <br />  <br />Mr. Trudgeon asked for a formal vote, if indicated, for the strategic plan update; and requested <br />  <br />any additional guidance from the HRA to staff on the preliminary budget before the HRA’s <br /> <br /> <br />August 31, 2009 meeting and formal recommendation to the City Council. <br /> <br /> <br />  <br />Motion: Member Majerus moved, seconded by Member Pust to approve the updated <br /> <br /> <br />“Roseville HRA Strategic Plan 2008 – 2012” (Attachment A) as presented. <br />  <br />Discussion ensued related to accepting the strategic plan update without accepting staff’s <br /> <br />proposed budget, with Mr. Trudgeon advising that the strategic plan was a stand alone <br /> <br />