My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-07-27_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
2009-07-27_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2010 11:54:26 AM
Creation date
3/18/2010 11:54:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Monday, July 27, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />document, and was simply aspirational in nature; but that the budget itself needed to be <br /> <br />determined on its own merits. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that, by the HRA approving the strategic plan, it provided staff with <br /> <br />ongoing indicators of the HRA’s priorities, as well as providing opportunities for staff to <br /> <br />pursue funding sources as they came up and continued monitoring. Mr. Trudgeon noted that <br /> <br />the strategic plan was a four (4) year plan, and not limited to accomplishing all goals within <br /> <br />one (1) year. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Maschka cautioned potential deterioration of the City’s multi-family housing complexes <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />without beginning to finance this initiative, with problems currently being experienced in the <br /> <br /> <br />southeast corner of the community, and continuing to escalate in other complexes. Chair <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Maschka opined that the need was obvious for some solution, and further opined that initial <br /> <br /> <br />funding still didn’t get the City to a position to address situations, without further consideration <br /> <br /> <br />for public/private partnerships similar to the Har Mar Apartment project, and that suggested by <br /> <br /> <br />Member Masche with Ecumen. Chair Maschka noted that the HRA had achieved consensus <br /> <br /> <br />that there was a definite need to pursue this issue; however, he further noted the need for the <br /> <br /> <br />HRA to bring the City Council into the picture acknowledging the need and determining how <br /> <br /> <br />best to accomplish the funding, whether through levy or bonding authority. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Ayes: 7 <br /> <br />Nays: 0 <br /> <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />2010 Preliminary Budget Comments/Feedback <br /> <br />Chair Maschka opined that the preliminary was realistic; however, questioned if it was realistic <br /> <br />in this economy. <br /> <br /> <br />Member Pust suggested that last year’s HRA budget was also realistic; however, suggested <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />that the HRA seek limitations from the City Council specific to budgetary increases to get a <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />sense of how to present a preliminary budget request; whether at zero percent of at 3.9% as a <br /> <br /> <br />cap; and leaned toward a zero percent increase. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Kelsey noted the need for the HRA’s Finance Subcommittee to meet to further refine the <br /> <br /> <br />preliminary budget request before the August 31, 2009 HRA regular meeting. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Maschka questioned if the City Council was prepared to consider anything other than a <br /> <br /> <br />zero percent budget and levy increase; noting the ramifications experienced from past actions <br /> <br /> <br />in not even meeting inflationary increases. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Member Majerus suggested that the City Council may have expectations of the HRA. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Chair Maschka suggested that additional discussion should be driven on where the City <br /> <br />Council wanted the HRA to go and how to fund projects effectively to continue. Chair <br /> <br />Maschka provided comments based on his financial expertise of the current economy and <br /> <br />several opinions and projections as to the next 12 – 18 months and how economic recovery <br /> <br />may proceed. Chair Maschka further suggested that many of the goals outlined in the strategic <br /> <br />plan could be initiated without substantial funds (i.e., energy efficiency, selling Roseville) and <br /> <br />could be accomplished in a budget similar to that presented in 2009. However, Chair Maschka <br /> <br /> <br />spoke in support of exploring available private/public/non-profit funding opportunities for <br /> <br /> <br />potential multi-family projects, even without intending to initiate a funding situation at this <br /> <br />time. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Member Pust suggested that the HRA agree that the goals of the strategic plan are approved, <br /> <br />that the HRA “lay low” yet in 2010 until more firm economic recoveries are indicated. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.