My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-15_Agenda
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Housing Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2006
>
2006-08-15_Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2011 8:05:06 AM
Creation date
3/24/2010 1:42:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/15/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meeting date: June 19, 2006 p. 1 of 7 <br /> Roseville Housing and Redevelopment Authority <br />Citizen Advisory Group on Rental Housing <br /> <br />June 19, 2006 Meeting Notes <br /> <br />Present : Warren Anderson, Ron Bartz, Paul Bradley, Sue Hackett, Kevin Kelly, Annette <br />Phillips, Dan Roe, Cory Schmitt, Joe Scheunemann, Bob Venters <br />Staff : Don Munson, Roseville Codes Coordinator <br />Facilitator : Carol Swenson, Center for Policy, Planning, and Performance <br /> <br /> <br />Welcome and Introductions <br /> Carol Swenson opened and facilitated the m eeting. Everyone took turns providing a self- <br />introduction. <br /> <br /> <br />Code Enforcement Presentation, Don Munson <br /> Don provided an overview of Code Enfor cement. The purposes of the enforcement <br />program are to 1) address public nuisances; 2) en sure building and lot maintenance; and 3) attend <br />to land use enforcement. Behind these specific purposes are the goals of maintaining property <br />values and community livability. <br /> Don provided two handouts: The Land Use Violation Update for the 1 st Quarter of 2006 <br />and an example of an memo to the city manage r about an Administrative Ticket issued to a <br />nuisance property in Roseville. <br /> Don noted that the most common complaints his department receives involve cars and <br />parking issues, property maintenance, and overcro wding in single-family homes. In his opinion, <br />the complaints are rooted in property owner concerns about the negative impact on property <br />values and ability to sell a property quickly—not concern that the property is rented or owner- <br />occupied. <br />Occasionally, they receive complaints from renters about problems such as no heat, <br />plumbing that needs repair, and house repairs. Under present ordinances, the City is not in a <br />position to respond to renters’ complaints. <br /> Don also shared staff research on tre nds they are seeing in the number of non- <br />homesteaded houses. He indicated that non-homest eaded properties are about 5% of the city’s <br />housing stock, but the source of about 20% of the complaints they receive. In his estimation, <br />about 30% of the non-homesteaded houses ar e in non-compliance with City codes. <br /> From his observations, disrepair is the most common complaint the City receives. And in <br />many cases, seniors or single women often without the resources or physical ability to attend to <br />necessary maintenance own these houses. <br /> In the case of complaints affiliated with students, parents of students typically buy the <br />home for the adult child to live in with other students who pay rent. <br /> The City is also receiving more calls from people seeking to buy distressed properties to <br />buy inexpensively. Often these are rent ed out without making improvements. <br /> With the adoption of the Property Maintenan ce Code, the City is in a better position to <br />assist renters with some of their complaints, but inspectors still have no authority to enter a
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.