Laserfiche WebLink
BWSR Meeting Minutes <br />October 29, 1998 <br />Page Five <br />organizing the stay in Lanesboro. Chair Roer and board members appreciated the <br />opportunity to tour southeastern Minnesota. <br />Chair Roer called for a break in the meeting at 10:00 a.m. The meeting reconvened at <br />10:15 a.m. <br />State Cost-Share Rule Amendment for Farmstead Windbreaks -Wayne Zellmer <br />explained that in 1997 the Minnesota legislature adopted statutes section 103C.501, <br />subd. 6 as follows: The rules may provide that cost-sharing may be used for farmstead <br />windbreaks and shelterbelts for the purposes of energy conservation and snow <br />protection. The BWSR has not amended such rules. On September 23, 1998, the <br />Cost-Share/Soil Conservation Committee convened to provide to the BWSR their <br />recommendation on amending the State Cost-Share Program Rule to provide cost- <br />sharing on farmstead windbreaks. <br />The Committee Recommendation is: <br />1) The BWSR should enter into the rule amending process only if additional funds are <br />legislatively appropriated. <br />2) The allocation policy should remain as it is. BWSR would give blanket approval for <br />SWCDs to spend any part of their 20% technical and administrative portion on low <br />priority erosion and water quality improvement projects, which presently includes <br />farmstead windbreaks. <br />3) The BWSR would support a MASWCD legislative cost-share funding initiative for <br />additional program funding. <br />** Moved by Allan Oehlke, seconded by Dwain Otte, to amend the committee <br />recommendation to strike #2. Dwain Otte explained that #2 is null and void because <br />water quality and erosion control does not qualify. Discussion followed. Roll calf vote: <br />Opposed: Tripp, Anderson, Dahlvang, Roer, Uppgaard, Sando, Bloomgren, Massey, <br />Heil. Affirmative: Otte, Annexstad, Oehlke, Krabbenhoft, Imholte, Cobb. Motion failed. <br />Moved by PY7arv Tripp, seconded by Jim Anderson, to adopt #3. Discussion followed. <br />Motion tivithdrawn. There are numerous demands on the Cost-Share Program from <br />urban and lakes; that is water quality and erosion control related and new requests <br />would better focus there than on other areas. <br />** Moved ~.;~ Pat Blocmgrer,, seconded by Marv Tripp, to adopt Alternative A, that BWSR <br />should not enter into the rule amending process to provide cost-share for farmstead <br />windbreaks. The focus of the program must remain on soil conservation and water <br />98-70 quality improvement and protection. Motion passed on a voice vote. <br />