Laserfiche WebLink
For more information on <br />BI~SR LC projects, contact <br />Jim Birkholz, 651/296-079. <br />For more information on RIM <br />Reserve changes, contact Tim <br />Fredbo at 651/296-080. <br />source, at its May 26 meeting. <br />Checks will be mailed to local <br />governments in August or <br />September. <br />In addition, BWSR received <br />5500,000 to allocate to counties <br />in southeastern Minnesota to <br />update and digitize soil sur- <br />veys. <br />el YeSt 1 eS®t <br />e3e ~ <br />c a es ye <br />The Legislature approved <br />several changes to the RIM <br />Reserve Program, including: <br />® allowing RIM Reserve <br />easements to augment <br />other set-aside agree- <br />ments, aslong asthe <br />RIM Reserve easements <br />provide additional <br />natural resource ben- <br />efits. For example, <br />under the change, land <br />currently enrolled in the <br />federal Conservation <br />Reserve Program (CRP) <br />will be eligible for <br />enrollment in RIM <br />Reserve, with the RIM <br />Reserve easement <br />beginning when the <br />CRP easement ends. <br />1SCe1 ~ S <br />Legislation accomplishing a <br />variety of miscellaneous things <br />passed this session, including: <br />® increasing general <br />services handing to soil <br />and water conservation <br />districts by 5228,000 <br />per year, for total annual <br />general services funding <br />of $3.867 million. <br />® allocating $ l 00,000 <br />annually to the Red <br />River Basin Board for <br />the 2000-2001 bien- <br />nium, provided that <br />North Dakota, South <br />Dakota and Manitoba <br />provide matching funds <br />based proportionately <br />on their share of land <br />within the watershed. <br />This handing is to <br />develop a comprehen- <br />sive water management <br />plan for the region. <br />® increasing funding for <br />the Minnesota River <br />Joint Powers Board by <br />approximately 537,000, <br />to 5100,000 per year. <br />~ t I' e3 1°CeS <br />eta s e ~s ti <br />e~te 3Ve a to ~ <br />t t SSe <br />After much discussion about <br />changes to state wetlands law, <br />a compromise bill (Senate File <br />83) passed the Senate but <br />became a victim of time con- <br />straints in the House of Repre- <br />sentatives. Senate File (SF) 83 <br />would essentially more closely <br />2 <br />