My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001-01-04_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2001
>
2001-01-04_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2010 2:44:12 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 2:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/4/2001
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Plan Reviewers <br />Fromt Karen Chandler, on Behalf of Grass Lake WMO Board <br />Subject:. Grass Lake WMO Board Responses to Comments on Draft Watershed Management Plan <br />Date: December 26, 2000 <br />c: Grass Lake WMO Board and Staff <br />Page: 10 <br />9. GLWMO Role in Connecting Land Use Planning to Stormwater Management Planning <br />Reviewer Comments: <br />Reviewer Location(s) in Comment <br />Letter Comments <br />BWSR Items circled "9" The BWSR believes the GLWMO plan should inclltde an <br /> inventory of park management plans to allow for cost <br /> effective implementation of stormwater management <br /> projects by partnering with or adding to park improvement <br /> programs. <br /> The BWSR suggests that the GLWMO develop a map of <br /> redevelopment opportunities, since they provide <br /> opportunities to improve stormwater management. <br />GLWMO Response to Comments: <br />Since the GI,WMO will not be a permitting agency, it is the sole responsibility of the member cities to <br />regulate land use. The cities do take into consideration parks, other types of land use, park projects, <br />redevelopment projects, and other opportunities when they are siting stormwater management facilities. <br />The cities need to balance many competing wishes, needs, and limited funds when considering stormwater <br />projects. <br />Figures 3 and 4 in the GLWMO plan show existing and future impervious coverage, respectively and <br />Figure 5 in the GLWMO plan shows the expected changes in imperviousness and redevelopment areas in <br />the WMO. Section 5.3, A. General Policies, policy 3, encourages the member cities to take full advantage <br />of redevelopment opportunities to improve stormwater management and water quality. The same policy <br />states that the "cities are to require that all stormwater management upgrades conform to the policies in this <br />plan (both water quality and water quantity policies)." <br />10. Retrofit of Stormwater Systems <br />Reviewer Comments: <br />Reviewer Location(s) in Comment <br />Letter Comments <br />BWSR Items circled "I O" The BWSR states that the GLWMO plan does not include <br /> an inventory and analysis of (stormwater) retrofit <br /> opportunities, nor does it include a defined strategy for <br /> pursuing federal financing of retrofit opportunities. The <br /> BWSR encourages the GLWMO to pursue federal money <br /> to finance retrofit projects "involving areas identified by <br /> state/fed/regional. water quality standards. For `resources <br /> of local concern,' provide retrofit inventory to cities." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.