My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001-01-04_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2001
>
2001-01-04_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2010 2:44:12 PM
Creation date
4/14/2010 2:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/4/2001
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Plan Reviewers <br />From€ Karen Chandler, on Behalf of Grass Lake WMO Board <br />Subject: Grass Lake WMO Board Responses to Comments on Draft Watershed Management Plan <br />Date:. December 26, 2000 <br />c: Grass Lake WMO Board and Staff <br />Page: 12 <br />ll. Best Management Practices <br />Reviewer Comments: <br />Reviewer Location(s) in Comment <br />Letter Comments <br />Met Council Items circled "11" The Met Council suggests that the GLWMO consider <br /> joining the work group that is developing a best <br /> management practices manual for small site construction <br /> projects.. <br />Ramsey County Items circled "11" Ramsey County found Table 5-9 (recommended BMPs <br /> according to watershed) confusing and thinks the headings <br /> and purpose need clarification. <br />GLWMO Response to Comments: <br />The GLWMO Board will encourage its member cities to take part in the small site BMP working group <br />and report back to the GLWMO Board regarding the group. The GLWMO plan will make reference to <br />future BMP manuals (e. g. the small site const~^uction pr°ojects BMP manual currently underway) and will <br />encourage the member cities to adopt these BMPs as part of their erosion and sediment control <br />ordinances. <br />Table 5-9 lists recommended BMPs, based on the level of stormwater treatment occurring in the <br />watershed. Although not stated as such in the plan, the table is intended to be a guide for fully developed <br />areas, listing recommended BMPs to improve treatment of stormwater runoff in already developed <br />watersheds. For eXample, if a city already has a NURP basin in a developed watershed, and was looking <br />for ways to improve stormwater treatment, the city could implement a lawn fertilizer ordinance, rather than <br />retrofit the pond. More explanation about this table will be added to the GLWMO plan and Table S-9. <br />12. Regulatory Status of County Ditches <br />Reviewer Comments: <br />Reviewer Location(s) in Comment <br />Letter Comments <br />Ramsey County Items circled "12" Ramsey County notes that according to a 1992 county ditch. <br /> survey (and contt~ary to the GLWMO plan), there is a <br /> public ditch (County Ditch 19) that drains to Lake Owasso <br /> and it has not been conveyed to another authority. The <br /> county believes the GLWMO plan should clarify the <br /> regulatory status of the ditch. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.