Laserfiche WebLink
rtes to ere v <br />e y to i e r e' <br />The Minnesota Environmental <br />Initiative's Resources for Redevelop- <br />mentprogram (R4R) has financial, <br />technical and hands-on project man- <br />agement resources dedicated to the <br />redevelopment of blighted and poten- <br />Bally contaminated properties <br />(brownfields) for green open space <br />reuse. <br />R4R can help watershed districts put <br />together projects that will transform <br />blighted properties into sites that can <br />protect water quality, such as rain <br />gardens. Districts should investigate <br />environmental conditions at properties <br />they are considering for purchase, <br />especially if the land was used in the <br />past for industrial, commercial, agricul- <br />tural or even residential purposes. <br />Neglected or unattended properties <br />that have been the site of unauthorized <br />dumping should also be assessed. <br />R4R can provide resources to perform <br />environmental site assessments (phase <br />I and phase II investigations), as well <br />as greenspace design and implementa- <br />tion at properties slated for reuse as <br />restored habitat, natural areas, storm- <br />water treatment sites or other open <br />space. <br />Good candidate properties for R4R's <br />assistance are sites that could be <br />connected to adjacent parcels of open <br />space, have strong community interest <br />and can be permanently secured as <br />greenspace. <br />For more information, please contact <br />the Minnesota Environmental <br />Initiative's Resources for <br />Redevelopment staff <br />Megan Dobratz <br />Michael Welch <br />mdobratz(~mn-ei.org <br />mwelch a~,mn-ei.org <br />612-334-3388, ext. 104 <br />612-334-3388, ext. 107 <br />In addition, the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency also has similar funds <br />available for brownfields to <br />greenspace assessments. Please <br />contact. Cathy O'Dell at 651-282- <br />2381formore information. <br />The Minnesota Environmental <br />Initiative is a 13-year-old nonprofit <br />organization based in Minneapolis. <br />MEI builds innovative partnerships to <br />develop solutions to Minnesota's <br />environmental problems. For more <br />information, please visit www.mn- <br />ei.org <br />MEI's funding for Brownfields to <br />Greenspace projects was recom- <br />mended by the Legislative Commis- <br />sion on Minnesota Resources from the <br />Minnesota Environment and Natural <br />Resource Trust Fund. Additional open <br />space funding provided by the <br />McKnight Foundation and Hennepin <br />County Environmental Services. <br />• e • <br />Senator Keith Langseth <br />Now, we will try it again. Because 2005 is <br />a year when the Legislature must set and <br />appropriate the budget for the biennium., <br />the Senate plans to introduce a bonding <br />bill EARLY in the session. Hopefully, we <br />can pass a bill before members are too <br />involved in the appropriations bills. We <br />will put together a bill which is similar to <br />this year's which received bipartisan <br />support until the governor decided to play <br />games. The costs for projects have risen <br />dramatically so instead of saving money, <br />the Republicans have wasted money. My <br />hope is that in 2005 the games will stop <br />and the Senate will pass a bipartisan <br />supported bill that takes care of our <br />infrastructure needs and creates jobs. <br />Senator Cal Larson <br />the end of the session. Senator <br />Langseth's capital investment committee <br />was given less than two hours to review <br />and approve the package. The DFL <br />package would have cast nearly a $100 <br />million more over the neat five years in <br />debt service compared to the Governor's. <br />proposal. On the Senate floor, Senate <br />Republicans offered a $782 million <br />compromise proposal, which was quickly <br />rejected by the Senate Democrats. The <br />Senate Democrats took an "all or nothing" <br />approach and went home with the latter. <br />Clearly, we must Team from past mistakes <br />in order to enact a sound 2005 bonding <br />bill. Cooperation rather than confronta- <br />tion is key in the Minnesota Senate. As a <br />result of the recent House elections, <br />cooperation will also be critical in putting <br />together their bonding proposal. We have <br />an opportunity in both the Senate and <br />House to put together a bonding bill <br />based on needs, priorities and fiscal <br />reality rather than politics, egos and <br />gamesmanship. The Senate Republicans <br />are committed to putting together a sound <br />and prudent bonding bill. I hope the <br />Senate Democrats are likewise -success <br />depends on it. <br />