My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001-10-25_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2007
>
2001-10-25_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2010 2:18:46 PM
Creation date
4/16/2010 2:03:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/25/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GLWMO MEETING MINUTES -JULY 26, 2007 2 <br />Eckman asked if augmentation is possible for Lake Owasso. Aichinger <br />stated that the DNR would not approve any further augmentation of Lake <br />Owasso. <br />Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Watershed Management Plan <br />Aichinger stated that what is presented is the 20-page public version document <br />that describes the strategic core principles, vision and goals. There is also a <br />detailed plan as required by BWSR guidelines. There are six goals. that are <br />discussed in the Plan in terms of past accomplishments, challenges for the future <br />and steps to measure successful performance. A l0-year program of goals, budget <br />and a discussion of the funding program is included at the end of the document. <br />DeZellar asked the process for setting goals:Aichinger stated that multiple states, <br />state agencies and local governments ~~~e part of the process. Stai~f proposes and <br />drafts the goals that are then reviewed 1~~ ~ itizens and agency people. <br />Eckman noted the cost-share provision. `l~h i < ~~,-ould be something to consider for <br />Grass Lake for water to be infiltrated before i i <~~ ~ s in the system. <br />Root noted the 10-year cost overview does not sh~~~~ a comparison with the last 10 <br />years. Aichinger explained that i I~~ I 0-ye~,ar breakcl~ awn is shown in the detailed <br />plan. He added that the Lake 0~~. ~~"~ study results that will be available next <br />,. <br />spring might indicate a need far ,~iu~ther study bef~~re projects can be planned. <br />~\ <br />It was the consensu;~,~~f the Board ro take final action on the Ramsey-Washington <br />Metre Watershed District Watershed~anagement Plan at the next meeting. <br />~~r~~~~° <br />Board members «~ilLcontimie to revrew the plan until the next meeting and <br />consider program ~ic1~~ itic t~, ~ieimplemented. If a cost-share program fits some <br />objecti~e~; a pl:m~rr~ i~i~~n could-be considered. <br />3. Grey n i ~~ ~ n u n u u i l y swards Program <br />DeZell.u~ noted receipt of a letter from Claudette Chmieleski, representing <br />the l i i , of Shoreview, thanking GLWMO for the $1,000 Green Award. <br />B-2 Financ:i~all~eport <br />Schwartz stated that the financial activity report for the first six months of the <br />year shows bills paid, but does not reflect bills to be authorized for payment at <br />this meeting. <br />Root noted a discrepancy on Page 1, where the entries in the credit column total <br />more than the debit column. Schwartz explained that the columns are mislabeled. <br />He will send corrected information to the Board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.