My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2010_0510
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2010
>
CC_Minutes_2010_0510
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:57:08 AM
Creation date
5/26/2010 10:57:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/10/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 10,.2010 <br />Page 7 <br />• <br />Commissioner Wozniak commended the City's Planning staff and consultant on <br />their work on the zoning amendments and how it aided in the Commission's anal- <br />ysis. <br />Commissioner Gisselquist concurred and noted the mind set of Commissioners as <br />they remembered that this zoning code rewrite was being done on a code that may <br />date from 1959 to now, and the new code would serve the community for another <br />thirty-years going forward; and noted that staff coaxed Commissioners into re- <br />membering that they were thinking about future generations and land uses, as well <br />as those uses and situations currently in place. <br />Additional discussion included term status of the current Commissioners, their <br />demographics, age and gender as it related to their individual and corporate pers- <br />pectives; the diversity of the expertise of the current Commission; and the Com- <br />mission's desire to have an ongoing exchange of information between the City <br />Council and the Commission during the zoning code rewrite process to make sure <br />both bodies were in agreement with the direction being pursued. <br />Community Development Director Patrick Trudgeon advised that staff would be <br />providing several opportunities to bring information before the City Council, and <br />at the direction of the City Council, additional opportunities for joint meetings of <br />both bodies could be brought forward as indicated. <br />Mayor Klausing requested that staff consider providing anoff-schedule report to <br />Councilmembers of items before the Planning Commission that are not being <br />heard at the City Council level as well, to keep them aware of other issues before <br />the Commission. <br />Further discussion included the upcoming Public Hearings related to the Residen- <br />tial and Commercial portions of the zoning code rewrite and to which all residents <br />had been noticed and invited to attend the June Planning Commission meeting to <br />provide public comment and get a better sense of the next steps in the process. <br />Chair Doherty reiterated his request that the City Council provide their views <br />prior to that Hearing to ensure consistency. <br />Mayor Klausing suggested that it may be more appropriate to receive public <br />comment prior to the City Council expressing their input; expressing his prefe- <br />rence to receive that input in addition to the recommendations of the Planning <br />Commission before City Council decision-making. <br />• Councilmember Pust asked what the City Council could do to be a better conduit <br />and to further assist the Planning Commission. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.