CC_Minutes_2010_0628 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, June 28, 2010 Page 11 Further discussion included the PWET's role in providing leadership and exper- tise for both residential and/or commercial development or redevelopment, such as complete streets and low impact development through leadership design and making communities livable through management and maintenance of those aes- thetic infrastructure aspects, both amenities and liabilities of that development (e.g., pervious pavement and associated costs for installation and .long-term main- tenance to determine cost-effectiveness). Councilmember Roe noted that it made sense to have the PWET Commission work with the Planning Commission and staff to determine that their role in land use review should be, whether they were to serve in an educational capacity to other advisory commissions to provide information or review of specific applica- tions. Councilmember Roe suggested that the advisory groups have a joint dis- cussion among themselves, and make a recommendation to the City Council for further consideration. Councilmember Roe expanded on the appropriate roles of advisory commissions versus or complementing that of staff and the need for the City Council to under- stand and be made aware of the process before it reached them. Councilmember Roe encouraged volunteer commissions to bring their ideas forward, through staff, in order for them to find their way through the process. Additional discussion included technical levels of review by the PWET Commis- sion beyond current review; impacts of industrial stormwater plans and impacts to municipal stormwater plans. Councilmember Ihlan expressed her full support of the role of the PWET Com- mission in reviewing land use issues. Councilmember Ihlan questioned how the PWET Commission discerned their role in environmental issues (e.g., the role of trees in air and water quality),noting that the City currently lacked a tree ordin- ance requiring preservation and significant replacement of those lost to develop- ment. Member Stenlund noted discussions among the PWET Commissioners about the use of urban trees for water treatment; and expressed his personal note of concern in recognizing the MN climate and snow storage needs. Mr. Stenlund opined that it would not prove difficult to put together substantial guidance for a tree ordin- ance if so directed. Chair DeBenedet advised that his interpretation of the PWET Commission's role in land use development and review would be of a broad advisory capacity through making recommendation to the City Council on policy development is- sues and whether applications were complying with established policies. Chair . DeBenedet advised that this would provide another set of eyes, beyond the Plan-