Laserfiche WebLink
Member Mulder found this is a good start, but with the railroad �^acks on the north, there <br />should be some screening as viewedfi^om County Road "C". Pines or other conifers <br />would be appropriate. Member Cunningham asked for screening on all sides. <br />Member Duncan asked what a mobile home costs (used $2, 000-$1 S, 000 each; new <br />$15,000 -$30,000 each; $450/month rent). Could more upscale doublewide units be <br />added to the site? <br />Member Rhody asked if 16 ' x 80' unit (new) could fit on the existing lot? (no). At this <br />time it is notfeasible to take out the smaller units and replace them with doublewide <br />units. <br />Member Duncan suggested overall rigorous zoning compliance as a good approach to <br />the site. <br />Member Wilke asked if the managers maintain or encourage clean up of � the sites (yes). <br />Member Cunningham noted that the park has become a close-knit neighborhood. <br />Owners take pride in this; he was supportive to improve aesthetics. <br />Member Olson asked whether one or two parking spaces are allowed Park <br />requirements are one space per owner. <br />Member Rhody asked about the economics of� the site and relocation costs. <br />Member Duncan asked for details on leasing: 1) 30-day renewable lease, 2) 60 days to <br />remove unit after notice, 3) security deposit. <br />Member Olson asked if the units sell and move or just sell and leave. She asked for <br />details of tenure. <br />6.0 STAFF COMIV�NTS & FINDINGS <br />In reviewing this proposal, staff has the following comments: <br />6.1 The City's Comprehensive Plan map designates this area for "HDR" (High Density <br />Housing). The land should be zoned for uses that implement the theme of high density <br />housing. The properiy to the east is park; to the northeast -- diagonally across County <br />Road C is another high density housing site; to the north is railroad, then City Center <br />Institutional Uses; to the west is medium density housing; to the south is designated for <br />low density. <br />6.2 The City's Comprehensive Plan te�t indicates that fle�ble designs and mixes of uses <br />may be appropriate, should be judged on their own merits and if they redevelop, and <br />should be done through the Planned Unit Development Process. <br />6.3 The zoning of the site is inconsistent ("R-2" and `B-3") and should be either R-8 Mobile <br />Home Park (used primarily for entirely new Mobile Home Parks) or a new PUD with <br />underlying zoning of "R-8" (Mobile Homes). <br />PF3225 RCA (052101) Page 4 of 10 <br />