2001_0924_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

8.0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission held the required public hearing on May Oy, 2U01. An excerpt from their meeting comments follows: Chair Rhody opened the hearing and requested Community Development Director. Dennis bVe�sCft, to provide a verbal summary of the staff report dated May 9, 2001. Lurry Sulera, representing Roseville Estptes LLC, stated they are exeited about the new proposals, and would like the opportunity to improve the purl��ng and Iundseaping. Member Cunningham asked about moving units. Lurry ,S'uleY�1 stated no units would be lost. Member Wilke asked ifthe RUs ure owned by the residents in the Park: (it ntay be outside owners). Could the R �s be eliminated? (Yes, if more manzrfacttu�ed housing was possible). Member Cunningham asked how many R Vs are in the Park u! this time (None). Member Rhody asked if the owners huve met with the residents; this planning proeess requires inelusion of the residents. Member R/7pc1y eneouraged resident meetings with the owners (no formal meeting has been held to date). Member Cunninghum asked ifRUs have no place in the future: �� Whut could go on the site in the futzn�e? (4 manufcrctured housing sites). Helen Gri�n, resident, noted that the children are located in the center of the site; the plan should loeate the playground in that C1Yea. Ms. ('ir ff� asked if a privacy fence would preclude the mud turtle migrution and stated she liked to look at the adjace�Tt pond. Visitors were allowed lo park adjaee�tt to units; the new parl��ng is too far, fi'v»� units. Could parl��ng be looked into in detail.'� Larry Sulera noted new solidfenee would be irtstalled. Parking is the tough issue. By tal��ng RVs away from the frorat, parl��ng is also lost. Amy Murphy, resident. expressed concern about the purk. She feels thut RV,s should not be in the park,� the owners rent units in the Park and this makes the park look dumpy. If the rental units are removed, could new units be placed o)7 the site? Could rental units be barred? Could rental unit owner background checks be required. � Amy Murphy said she would prefer less Park drive- through by the Poliee. Ben Storey, resident. said mobile home owners along the south side parked on the RYs site and on Rose Place in the winter when snow and plowing occurs. How will str°eets be cleared and still allow parking (Difficult). Member Wilke asked for• the ma�ragemerat plan for plowing and towing. Roseville Mobile Home Park Plan (092401) Page 7