Laserfiche WebLink
Larry Salera noted that plowing and parking is a problem. There are guidelines regardiitg when <br />and where the snow is carried awuy. If there are four RV spots vuCaled in the winter, it allows <br />for more parking. <br />Member Wilke asked if RYs could be eliminated entirely and udd to the pCarking. (If done. the <br />rental income would decline and huve to be shared by existing residents. There is not enough <br />land to do everything. New units are now in the park; re�ttal units are being eliminated.) <br />Larry SUlerp i'roletl thut he must know what to do with RV units for this season (rent is month to <br />month). After this season, if no R V,s ure permitted he would, instead, provide four manufactured <br />units. Background checks of residents are done. <br />Dave Mcry, resident. asked if diagonal parking on the streets had been considered. (Streets are <br />not wide, n1tlS! be able to get curs and emergency vehicles 1{7rpugh). <br />Richard Kettle, Twin Home pct acent neighbor. would like to see lanclscaping along borders. <br />Does the City I�pve plans to open up Rose PIRCC' fo�" f t�l'!hC'P access or even a walkway? There <br />used to be a 30;foo1 easement/buffer qlon� the west side. The south side brush belongs to the <br />Mobile Home Purk. How close ectn a unit or storage be to a street.7 <br />John Wilson, resident, noted thut the southwest corner of the road was under water when snow <br />melts. <br />Polly iiYiffln 111t�StrUted that in 19J5 there were no acjacent homes; she opposed screening. <br />George Berg. resident, would like to see psphCrlt in jront removed. The snow plowing in winter is <br />a problem. He moved his cur to Rose Pluce in winter. <br />Amy Murphy, resident, asked whut could be done with spacing of units and could more speed <br />limits (IO mph) be added to site? <br />Sheila Lumpkin said the community is involved in this process. On Lexington snow is carted <br />away. Parking is limited,� there ure four spaces 1n fi'ont, six in rear areas. If residents park on <br />Rose Place, there are Compinlnls fi'ont �'esidents to the south. Having a des�gnQfed district will be <br />valuable. Screening is objeCllUnpble. She supported enclosing the t�^ash ureas. <br />Carol S{tiels, 1 I]O Rose Place. noted that collaborative pluming ainong pu�•b7ers City. Park, <br />residents and neighbors to south is importarrt. The neighbors to the south are the Central Purk <br />Town Home Associutio�i. <br />Chuck Nagle. an R V owner. noted that R V owners ure there for the entire summer. He stated the <br />R T�parking was a winter parking areu that henef ted both R Vs and residents. He is waiting for a <br />conclusion to the seusorlal K V issue. He was unaware of d�culty with RV owners (they are <br />older, have no pets, and have only one car). Only one non-RV vehicle has been parked in fi^ont <br />of the Mobile Home Park (cr pick-up truck). <br />There were no further comments; Chair Rhody closed the hearing. <br />Chair Rhody suid he supported a PUD,- improvements qYe needed and this is a good start. <br />Member Olson agreed. The play area should be more centrally located. Landscaping should <br />replace fence screening. R T�s should be reviewed. <br />Member Wilke found the concept to be an excellent idea. This would be more proactive work by <br />Roseville Mobile Home Park Plan (092401) Page 8 <br />