Laserfiche WebLink
3. Notification Policy <br />Beets reviewed the history of this subject and the draft notification ordinance in the <br />Council's packet. Council Members discussed and dissected each section of the <br />proposed ordinance, suggesting, among other things: <br />. Using some of the language in state law respecting public notification; <br />. Limiting the notification area for storm drainage pond construction to some <br />distance from the proposed pond, and not include the entire drainage area that <br />may potentially be served by the pond; <br />. Noting that the ordinance-specified notification requirements were minimum <br />requirements and the staff was free to provide greater notification for specific <br />projects or programs if the circumstances warranted. <br />Beets indicated that the Council's suggestions would be incorporated into a new draft <br />and circulated for comment among staff and returned to the City Council, he hoped, on <br />December 17. <br />4. City Health & Dental Plans for 2002 <br />Butterfield outlined the proposed health and dental plans that City employees seemed to <br />support, based on employee meetings and feedback. She indicated that contracts for <br />health and dental insurance would be on the Council's business meeting agenda on <br />November 26. Klausing asked about how the proposed plan premiums compared with <br />the current premiums employees and the City were paying, and the premiums being paid <br />in other cities. Maschka commented about the health care marketplace, the City's <br />history with our health and dental plans, and the recent settlement by state employees. <br />Kysylyczyn asked about the percentage of the total premium being paid by the City, as <br />contrasted with the percentage the State was paying for state employees. Council <br />Member Elect Kough asked about the potential for a multi year contract with our health <br />and dental providers. Maschka commented about effect of deductibles on premiums and <br />customer behavior. <br />5. Pond Aesthetics <br />Schwartz and Bierscheid overviewed the request from the City Council that staff study <br />and report back to the Council concerning pond aesthetics in Roseville. Schwartz <br />discussed the map included in the Council's packet that inventories the location of <br />appro�mately 100 lakes, ponds, and wetland areas within the boundaries of Roseville. <br />Bierscheid then introduced Peter McDonagh, of the Kestrel Design Group, who was <br />retained to evaluate enhancing the pond area in Owasso Hills. McDonagh discussed the <br />environmental and aesthetic value of certain kinds of pond enhancements. He reviewed <br />similar work done at various locations in the metro area. He discussed resident survey <br />tools, formal and informal buffer treatments, and maintenance costs. He noted that <br />drainage and wetland areas in the past were often ignored as leftover space, and now <br />there were strong environmental and aesthetic reasons to regard them as natural green <br />2 <br />