My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0211_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0211_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 3:09:40 PM
Creation date
10/25/2010 1:45:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. How should the plan compliment the study area? <br />♦ Provide adequate access and connectivity to all phases and adjoining <br />properties. <br />♦ Provide senior housing in the area and link it to seniors moving out/selling <br />their single family homes to first time homeowner families. <br />♦ No major concern about how the school district would be impacted from <br />the development and redevelopment of the area. <br />♦ Focus just on Arona and how that piece can benefit the City. <br />♦ Disperse traffic around the site and entry points to reduce individual <br />impacts. <br />♦ Provide access to the south through NCR/�LT site. <br />4. What is the level/amount of greenspace desired in the area? <br />♦ Green space should be part of package but used as amenity with ponding, <br />and housing adjacent to both. <br />5. Is this project responsible for replacing park land elsewhere in the <br />community? <br />♦ There should be some greenspace but the amount may vary depending <br />on the type of development. <br />♦ Green space should complement the development and be disbursed <br />throughout, near new and existing residential areas. <br />♦ Use whatever greenspace is provided as an amenity including the pond <br />area or new drainage areas. <br />♦ Have a green space town square surrounded by the new development. <br />♦ The City does not need more park space in this area. <br />♦ The City can not fund more parks and does not need more programmed <br />parks. <br />♦ Support green space that compliments development. <br />♦ The City could sell a portion of the land to the adjoining neighbors and <br />they can maintain it as a park with no pubic subsidy. <br />♦ Include some greenspace that would be available for all to use but <br />maintained by a development association or special service district. <br />♦ There was general agreement, again, for a maximum of 4-acres for park. <br />♦ When Pioneer Park was purchased the Council promised that this would <br />be the last public park in the community. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.