Laserfiche WebLink
NIr. Thomas Paschke <br />February 6, 2002 <br />Page 2 <br />Most of the traffic accessing Le�ngton Avenue to the south will use the direct driveway while <br />sma11 amounts may use Roselawn Avenue. However, traffic to the north may be more inclined to <br />use the Roselawn Avenue access. Thus, the traffic load from the development will be primarily <br />through the driveway to Le�ngton Avenue with some traffic using Roselawn Avenue. The <br />Roselawn Avenue traffic to the east or to the west will be primarily oriented to the Roselawn <br />Avenue driveway. <br />To place the traffic volumes in perspective, the additional traffic on Roselawn Avenue east of the <br />development in the P.M Peak Hour is 8 which calculates to appro�mately one vehicle every 71h <br />minutes. Over a 16 hour travel day (6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.), the additional traffic would average <br />one car every 12 minutes. Roselawn Avenue to the west, using the same method of calculations, <br />would ha�e appro�mately one additional vehicle every 9 minutes over the 16 hour heavy period <br />with much less traffic during the nighttime hours and hea�ier volumes in the P.M Peak period. <br />We have not reviewed the site plan layout for geometric design, accessibility by delivery vehicles <br />and transit vehicles or general operations. <br />If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call me. <br />Sincerely, <br />SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON 1NC. <br />—���Lx� UG��/I l�l/bl�nw� <br />Glen Van Wormer, P.E. <br />Senior Transportation Engineer <br />sah <br />\�spfiles2�cotpdoc\wp\projectsks�rosev�9801 k�pasclilce. f06.doc <br />