Laserfiche WebLink
� ' � <br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 21st day of October, 2002, at 6:30 <br />p.m. <br />The following members were present: <br />and the following were absent: <br />Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO SECTION 1004.O1A11 AND <br />SECTION 1004.02D4 (SIDE YARD SETSACK ADJACENT TO PUSLIC STREET) OF <br />THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />388 SOUTH MCCARRONS SOULEVARD (PF 3430). <br />13.5 foot variance to Section 1004.02D4 (Side Yard setback Adjacent a Public Street) to allow <br />construction of certain home improvements and an attached garage to the principal structure at <br />3 88 South McCarrons Boulevard. <br />WHEREAS, MaCk Meade has requested a variance to Section 1004.02D4 (Side Yard <br />Setback Adjacent to Public Street) in order to construct an attached garage and living area <br />improvement to his home; and <br />WHEREAS, the Meade parcel is located at 388 South McCarrons Boulevard and legally <br />described at as: <br />NEEDS CORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION <br />PID Number: 13-29-23-31-0116 <br />WHEREAS, Section 1004.02D4 limits a corner lot to a setback requirement of 30 feet <br />from each public right-of-way; and <br />WHEREAS, Mack Meade desires to construct an attached tuck under garage and living <br />area improvement 16.5 feet from the eastern properiy line (adj acent to Western Avenue); and <br />WHEREAS, the placement of the addition to the existing home requires a 13.5 foot <br />variance to Section 1004.02D4 of the Roseville City Code; and <br />WHEREAS, said addition requires 1.5 foot variance for the garage to Section <br />1004.01 A 11 of the Roseville City Code; and <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />Meade variance request on October 2, 2002, and recommended (5-O) approval of the request, <br />based on findings outlined in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated <br />October 2, 2002. <br />