My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6089
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6000
>
res_6089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:08:45 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 5:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6089
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />found to be satisfactory and was directed to be filed by the <br /> <br />Acting Manager. <br /> <br />The Mayor then called on Mr. Honchell, the Public Works <br /> <br />Director, to explain the improvement and answer questions. After <br /> <br />Mr. Honchell's presentation, the Mayor then called on Mr. Popovich, <br /> <br />city bond consultant, to explain the financing of the proposed <br /> <br />improvement. After Mr. Popovich's presentation, all persons <br /> <br />present were afforded opportunity to be heard, and the names <br /> <br />and addresses of the persons appearing and heard by the Council, <br /> <br />and the substance of the views presented by them were as follows: <br /> <br />MR. WAYNE KRALL, 240 Transit Avenue: There are only three <br />homes involved in the improvement and they feel there's no problem <br />with the road. Two months ago they were objecting to the <br />construction of a proposed shopping center in the area at a public <br />hearing and were assured they wouldn't have to worry about excess <br />traffic. Now they're told because of expectant excess traffic <br />they have to have a new road. Further said that Ban Con has <br />caused the problem on the road with their heavy equipment. <br /> <br />DR. L. F. ARCHBALD, 2450 Galtier: Doesn't feel they <br />should be paying for a new road from which there will be no benefit. <br />Also questioned being assessed for sanitary sewer when they're <br />already connected to it. Mr. Honchell explained that if they were <br />already connected to sanitary sewer or water there would be no <br />further assessment for those improvements. Dr. Archbald said he <br />also objects to paying assessments for the road. Asked about <br />corner lot assessments. <br /> <br />MR. PAT RYAN - owns Lot 1: Plans to build. Asked what the <br />time schedule was for the improvement. Mr. Honchell said the <br />work should be completed by next Fall. Mr. Ryan said he was one <br />of the petitioners in favor of the sanitary sewer portion of the <br />improvement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.