My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6267
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6200
>
res_6267
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:09:04 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 5:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6267
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of more discharge into the lake will cause further (inaudible) <br />quantities of water which can't be supported by the lake. We <br />have 129 signatures, primarily around the lake, quite a few in <br />the (inaudible). I haven't got a count of who lives inside and <br />who lives outside. I think anybody that lives and uses Lake <br />Josephine is certainly affected by further storm water run off. <br />We had a meeting with the Rice Creek Watershed where Mr. Honchell <br />presented his plan. I didn't take accurate notes but it seems to <br />me the Rice Creek water hydrologist indicated the water running <br />into the lake would be 72% - but I'm not sure that's accurate - <br />72% worse than what's in the lake today. It would only go up <br />about 2 to 3 inches on a large heavy rain storm. Two or three <br />inches would put the water in my front yard. 12 to 18 inches <br />would put it in my living room so again I think we have to be <br />very careful. Mr. Honchell indicated the quality of the water <br />going into the sewer would b~ no worse. First, I have a picture <br />of the sewer running into the lake. This is a sample I took <br />(inaudible) during the storm. You can see there's a little bit <br />of (inaudible) in it but basically it's pretty clean. The quality <br />of the lake is not too good. This was off my dock about 20 to 30 <br />feet from the storm sewer. In the height of the storm I took this <br />sample. In addition - we've lived at that area 7 years now and <br />over this period of time we have removed mufflers, which I real- <br />ize can't get into the St. Paul sewer, tires, inner tubes - we1ve <br />had it. Certainly the quality of the water has changed. I'm a <br />chemist, but I think it's obvious to the eye that the quality of <br />the water coming in would very seriously hurt the lake further. <br />The environmentalist indicated to the people that people have been <br />polluting the lake with their sewers. I don't think we can cor- <br />rect every wrong that's ever been made but we can't duck our heads <br />under our bills and (inaudible) we can see where the large 60 inch <br />storm sewer enters the lake (inaudible) on County Road C-2 that <br />that water shou~d be taken across Lexington and down into Little <br />Josephine and then drained back. For some unknown reason - maybe <br />Mr. Reiling - political pressure - I have no idea - the decision <br />was to take it down into the lake without any settling at all. <br />I think you can see we're talking about re-routing that water at <br />a fairly large expense. I question (inaudible) how much you will <br />have to spend in 10 years when you propose to take all that water, <br />run it into the sewer, restore it so it's a recreational area for <br />the people to use. I have this picture. You can see the seeds <br />coming in from the trees. If you look out, you can see the sand, <br />the (inaudible), the leaves and everything else that runs into the <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.