Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MAYOR LINEBARGER: You didn't get a good reaction to your <br />plan. Do you think they would wait on this regardless of what <br />this council did, and perhaps their study might give you some- <br />thing more of a benefit for updating this. Why are we proceed- <br />ing? I know we're required to hold the hearing, but why would <br />we proceed until we have the benefit of everything Rice Creek <br />Watershed (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I can't say what's legal bond or project- <br />wise, given some of these alternatives (inaudible) we could ~. <br />always opt for plans 1 through 5. In the first place Rice Creek <br />Watershed might approve it and we might have an unbondable pro- <br />ject. <br /> <br />MAYOR LINEBARGER: If we were ever to put something in at <br />those costs, there's no way we can assess that within Roseville. <br />That could possibly be part of Rice Creek's participation. That's <br />why I'm wondering about the feasibility of going ahead. It's <br />certainly an alternative. <br /> <br />MRS. DEMOS: If this is a sub - Josephine and Little Jose- <br />phine are basically a sub Johanna watershed so then perhaps we <br />would come in for the total improvement so why should we go <br />ahead as a community? <br /> <br />MAYOR LI~~BARGER: How does the rest of the Council feel <br />about that? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN BRENNAN: I definitely feel we should correct <br />the problems going into the lake. <br /> <br />MAYOR LINEBARGER: And it would be a little difficult for <br />Roseville to do that alone. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN HESS: I make a motion we table this until we get <br />more information from the Rice Creek Watershed on the Josephine <br />and entire area. <br /> <br />MRS. DEMOS: Do you want to table? <br /> <br />MAYOR LINEBARGER: In either event, it will come up again. <br />We have to readvertise. <br /> <br />20 <br />