My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_888
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
00xxx
>
800
>
res_888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:09:31 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 5:28:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
888
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />roll was to be transl..:',b,:e( 'LU the CO'I.':.nty Auditor to be extended <br /> <br />upon the proper ta)~ list of the county for collections hereafter <br /> <br />as therein provided" and <br />WHEREAS Harold F. Keppler, the owner of Lot 6, Block 1, <br />Sec. 8, Laurie Addition, Parcel 7945, upon which was assessed <br />the amount of Eight Hundred Twenty-five and 98/100 Dollars <br />($825.98), mailed his pre-paid assessment on November 15, the <br />last day of the thirty day grace period, which payment was not <br />received until Monday, November 18, after said assessment roll <br />had been transmitted by the village clerk-administrator to the <br /> <br />County Auditor, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS the estate of George A. Sperl, the owners of the <br />N. 224' of the E. 130' of Section 16, Township 29, Range 23, <br />subject to Trunk Highway 51-l25 and County Road B, upon which <br />was due an assessment of Six Hundred Seventeen and 50/100 Dollars <br /> <br /> <br />($617.50), issued its check to the village on November 15 to <br /> <br /> <br />pre-pay said assessment; which, when presented by the village to <br /> <br /> <br />the bank upon which it was drawn, was returned to the village <br /> <br /> <br />upon presentment because the maker thereof had issued a stop <br /> <br /> <br />order on said check; had changed their desire to pre-pay the <br /> <br /> <br />assessment and wanted said assessmen't spread for collection <br /> <br />with real estate taxes as provided in the October 14 resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.