My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6335
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6300
>
res_6335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:09:44 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:48:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6335
Resolution Title
Approving County plans for County Road C Improvement No. P-75-13
Resolution Date Passed
1/19/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone ln the audience that wishes to be <br />heard or ask a question? <br /> <br />REPRESENTATIVE OF BRIGGS TRANSPORTATION, 2360 County <br />Road c: what was the statement that you made, Mr. Leonard, <br />regarding when you thought you could start and when you <br />might finish? <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: with the approval of alignment and grade <br />from Roseville we go to the State of Minnesota for approval <br />of the project for funding out of the highway state funds - <br />we have community approval and money, we would expect it <br />would take six months or better in this right-of-way (in- <br />audible). There's a lot of questions that have to be solved <br />between the property owner to get this thing to work to <br />everybody's advantage. I think it will take six months or <br />better, probably another two or three months to get these <br />approvals, and six months in the right-of-way negotiation <br />area. our goal is to get the project awarded for contract <br />this fall - to take it out of our 1976 funds, with the <br />actual construction to be in 1977. <br /> <br />BRIGGS TRANSPORTATION REPRESENTATIVE: The second ques- <br />tion I would have to ask has to do with ingress and egress <br />during construction. <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: This road will be maintained open to <br />traffic and built under traffic. I think here last summer <br />or the summer before on Fairview near "c" we had an <br />improvement - we maintained traffic through the course of <br />construction and this would be built under similar <br />conditions. We would (inaudible) we might have to shut <br />down a driveway for a day while they pave (inaudible). <br /> <br />BRIGGS TRANSPORTATION REPRESENTATIVE: The other thing <br />I would like to ask about due to the nature of our business, <br />is security during construction. In other words, we have a <br />fence now, and during construction and especially during <br />construction you have less means of protection. <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: Two things can happen here. In your <br />particular case you have an existing fence that comes <br />around here, jogs there, and goes to the railroad tracks. <br />We can call, if it's the owner's wish, for a new fence and <br />location on the pJ,an - ask the contractor to have that <br />installed and complete and secured prior to removing the <br />existing fence. WE can, if that doesn't meet the owners <br />requirement and he feels that he wants to handle this <br />security problem himself, make that part of the right-of- <br />way negotiation and compensate him for removal of his <br />existing fence and making his own security measures. <br /> <br />BRIGGS TRANSPORTATION REPRESENTATIVE: That would be <br />another negotiable thing at the time of negotiations. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.