My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6369
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6300
>
res_6369
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:09:47 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:49:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6369
Resolution Title
Approving County Plans for Cleveland Avenue Improvement No. P-W-SS-76-9
Resolution Date Passed
5/10/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />cones. That's where the new curbs would be proposed. In through <br />all this area I think the road could be set .in to fit the ground <br />so it would all drain into the road even along this area. <br /> <br />Here we're coming to C-2, looking east on C-2. I think <br />we're discussing the possibility of having to adjust the eleva- <br />tion there. Looking west, it's higher to the west. North <br />through here - <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: Would you slow that down a little. <br /> <br />MR. LEONARD: What were you most interested in? I'm just <br />past C-2 where the commercial development is on the east side <br />just north of C-2. That's a driveway into some commercial <br />development there. There's an inlet structure there. That's <br />that inlet structure where the water gets in and heads for 35W. <br />Thatls where that picture is taken and again you can see the <br />cones there. They're a little bit off to one side and three or <br />four get into the grass on the west side. There aren't cross <br />streets here that I can relate this to and I'm not that familiar <br />with the area, but there's kind of a bank here on the left side <br />and I think if we jump up here you will see kind of a bank there <br />with a dead tree on the left side: then it comes into a low spot <br />coming into this new develoPment of new homes there. There's <br />some large lawns on the west side of the road and that ditch and <br />all that construction has been going on all winter on the right <br />side. <br /> <br />Now we're approaching County Road B coming up through <br />there. I think that's the last one. I had hoped to give some- <br />body an idea of about where the curbs would fit in relationship <br />to the present property development out there. If there are <br />particular questions, I can go back and look. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Mr. Popovich, will you give your summary. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Project 76-9 is estimated to cost $449,330 <br />which will largely be picked up by the c~unty and the portion <br />that the city would pay if the county goes ahead is $29,622 <br />which is the estimated cost of 75% of the cost of the curb and <br />gutter. That $29,622 would be IOO% assessed against benefited <br />property owners at $3.00 per front foot for residential and <br />$5.47 for commercial, industrial and multiple and the same prin- <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.