My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6474
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6400
>
res_6474
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:09:58 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:52:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6474
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-76-22 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
4/4/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />there and make somp. slight ,.'.ooifications on the e~dsting catch <br />basins. although wp're not proposing any nG~ l~~rk as such. The <br />grades will be nearly the same as tod2Y - just a few inches up or ~ <br />down in any direction. Th2t concludes this portion. <br /> <br />i.,LAyor, DEMOS: rc,r. '!?opovich r Nill you p:.es(:"n't the summary <br />of the financing. <br /> <br />f:'.i!.',:. POPOVICH~ '.l~he total published estimaced cost is $26,110. <br />'1'he s'treet, curb, and gutter break down to $2l.09l. There are <br />856.? assessable feet. If it \-vere assessed at 100% a foot it <br />would be $25.5 per foot, but because the Council adopted a <br />ne\i,j assessment policy las'c month. instead of $25.57 a front foot <br />it ljould be $6.39 a foot assessed against the property. the <br />b2lance picked up by gener2l taxes. <br /> <br />On the sanitary sewer portion. that cost is $2,66~.20, which <br />for six lots vvould be :ocOO% assessed for $t.!.44,.60 per lot. <br /> <br />f7ater servi'es are $L216.80o 100% assessed for six lotf:: <br />is $202.80 per lot. Add the $202. $~44 and $6.39 a front foot <br />aga inst the frontage:,2nd you come t,) t:1'2 tota 1 cost per lot 0 <br /> <br />Again, this would be recommended to be spread over 20 years <br />~\.;ith the 8% carrying charge. with the ric;ht of prepayment if they <br />desire. <br /> <br />]>F. ANDRE: 'trle ha ve re::.-e i ved a pet it ion oppos ing the improve- <br />ment from the property owners on the north side of Shryer Avenueo <br />The signatures represent 2018 North Lexington, l083 Shryer, l075 <br />;';hryer, 1.071 Shryero 1079 Ghryer - two signatures from each of <br />those properties. <br /> <br />I'J}won DENOS ~ At this time I will open this hearing to the <br />public. I will again remind you we will only be hec:ring from <br />those people who () re con'::erned wi.. th the Shryer Avenue project. <br />Agel in. p1ease state your name and address and use the microphone. <br /> <br />jlF. J,ENNF'I'H !iAVr:-;: 1083 :::;hryer: I have lived there siner" <br />J,951 and when the sewer and water went through there we tried <br />our oarndest to get the rOdo widened and put through" which could <br />not be done unless we pzio for the pro?erty - paid for the trees - <br />took up the fence 2nd numerous other things in order to have the <br />r.oC1d widened. Now, all of a sudden, out of cc clear blue sky, they <br />w~nt to put in ~urb ~nd gutter and a new road and all of us on the <br />north side of Shryer Avenue are not in favor of ito <br /> <br />I'1I~YOR DFf'110S: ['ir. [lavis, you do understand the Council tolas <br />petitioned by the owner on the south sidea <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.