My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6487
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6400
>
res_6487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:00 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6487
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-76-23 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
5/9/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COUNCILMAN HESS: The sewer is in. <br /> <br />MR. REILING~ It's in 15 years. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Since 1960 it's been in. <br /> <br />MR. REILING: Nobody has used (inaudible) except <br />Shoreview coming thr.)ugh \1i th their sewage. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: Who built that? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I'm not sure Which organization had the <br />contract - whether it was Rosevi11e or a combination of the <br />two. Certainly we'll research.. This proposal tonight is <br />not proposing any assessments for that sewer. We're not <br />proposing to build c duplicate sewer, and are not proposing to <br />assess anyone and start sending them bills next fall, but <br />you're correct th2lt as the sewer would be utilized, rhen the <br />appropriate fees would be charged, and if there are any credits <br />involved, those would be also brought to bear. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: Because it could be a possibility <br />that the oversizing of sewer lines - of course, we're getting <br />credits now from the Metropolitan Sewer Board. and I would <br />assume some of our sewer lines (inaudible) this area or farther <br />south have been oversized and that would be taken into consid- <br />eration at the time rates were (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. REILING: possibly so, but I knml1 the statement was <br />no assessment, and I was amazed on the next tax assessment to <br />find we were assessed and that W2IS for t-he trunk, so that was <br />charged. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: You have been paying sanitary sewer - <br /> <br />MR. REILING: (inaudible) area assessment. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: An acreage assessment. <br /> <br />MR. REILING: Water too. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I did not understand what you said about it <br />being satisfactory to let the water get through to Owasso. <br /> <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.