My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6487
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6400
>
res_6487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:00 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6487
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-76-23 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
5/9/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />going in and as he sold the lots, each lot owner was <br />c.ssessed (inaudible) amount of dollars for the improvements <br />so the people who want to develop the lend (inaudible) let them <br />pay for the assessment as they're buying their lot. Now, the <br />ide? of rcising horses is something else. Something came through <br />about 15 years ago that we would not raise animals in Roseville, <br />and we've had sheep and goats. and maybe we'd be better to <br />have that open space and let the cattle roam and use it for <br />that inste2ld of going through vii th all this so-called improve- <br />ments to benefit someone who really owns some ill-fated land <br />that really doesn't have any use - only to his pocket bo~k - <br />because the little money I'd get for that lot - really I don't <br />care about because I \'JC1nt to keep the lot for myself. The <br />intention when I bought, was so I'd have a little area for the <br />kids as they were growing up and if I was trying to make a <br />million dollars on the lot (inaudible) retain it and never sell it. <br />If he wants to buy it, I'll take it right now, but I feel as <br />a home owner - \'Jhy should we have to go to his benefit and 2Iid <br />him? <br /> <br />MR. LE ROY PEICKERT, 845 Brenner: How much is that land <br />worth without the roads in it? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I couldn't tell you. Open Space had it <br />appraised and there seemed to be considerable difference <br />of opinion. <br /> <br />MR. PEICKERT: How much? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: $300,000 plus. <br /> <br />MR. PEICKERT: To develop it, it costs $500,000. <br />Another thing - the pond is ridiculous. They're going to split <br />my lot up. But they go back every year to spray for <br />mosquitos. Now, they'll spray the pond. rmhat are you going <br />to do with the mosauitoes now. DO you know what they were <br />doing before? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL~ The idea is to have a deeper standing water <br />situation so it would not be the 3prawling. wet area, and by <br />brin~ing fill in, make it useful and have a smaller wet area <br />rather than an intermediate wet area. <br /> <br />-l8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.