res_6487 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The storm c.eWEr sy::tem - I might c(~d thv1- once cgain, since Shoreview is on the northern side. they would be paying half of the cost of the road. Ther::torm gewer fccilities would be proposed to pick up some drainage coming out- of Shoreview frow t-his new future road, come C'llong Avon wher0 it. would head e?sterly to new proposed pond that- will ~e di~cussed in a moment. Also, it will pick up the intersection drainage ?t Avon and Brenner, down Brenner to Millwood and 0Ut- t-o the pond, picking up some drainage on the interior of these lots which are sort of (inaudible) back there Clccording t:l our nrelirrincry calcul?t-ions. Also, a new line wf)uld re Dl1ilt clong Millwood, again where it would tie and go into the pond 2md again picking up a small amount of drainage in the interior or (inaudible) back ycrd locations. There is sowe exi~ting dr?inage t-hat exists in this area. There's a 12 inch culvert that goes out underneath Owasso Boulevard. I ~ight- ?ad thClt the C'reCl you see in blue depicts wh2lt we feel from? preliminary review are the lots that drvin toward this ~tor~ facility and would be included in 2ny improvement costs. Tho~e that ?re 'Outside are not proposed t':> be 2sr,esseo for 3t~rm draincge. This water would all be going {.o ? new pond c>t i-he end 'Of the Millwood cul-de- sac. You may see water laying arolnd or - not in the low c-reas, but. the pond is proposed to r.e dug, r'ctually lower than the ground is todpy. We have discu~sed this with the park people. They would like to see? ..,tending water pond approximately five feet deep - reCllly juc:;t for artistic and visual purp,>ses. Just a nice thing to have Clround a park. In Central Park there is Co larger pond. This pond would w,>uld have five feet of water in it, as mentioned previously. end this would be shaped in c way that it would only be (inaudible) f")ur slopes f')r safety pt)rposes. It 1,ormld h;:,lve Ci 10 foot flattened areCl !"IO people could wclk 2rounc'l the pond and ob- 1';erve it. There would be Cln()ther six f:>ot area 2'gein on c (in?udil:le) ~l,>pe t-h?t would g,> up to t-he existing - or to the propJsed gr'mnd e}ev?tions. The elevetion<o: ~N"ould be t;omewhat higher: especielly on t-he weqt end north ",ideo:::, than they are now :bec?u~e the. excess materi2l from this project is proposed to be f'pre?d throughout the park area to enaJ::-le the park to develop 2nd be usa~le to Fll the residents in the area. At the present t-ime itts not very fec:sible. There is also a long range pr0posal t.o get ~ome parking in this areCl so the people would be FbIe to drive and us~ the f~cility rather than park if you 're Clt the wrong end of t-he devel':>prnent. The pond is -4-