My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6487
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6400
>
res_6487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:00 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:52:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6487
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-76-23 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes, chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
5/9/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />n~t proposed, tt thi~ time, t':> have en outlet - somewhct different <br />in nature than usual; !'ut the recson is it drains a relatively <br />~mall are? and the 6 foot area beyond the little flat wCllk-way <br />is capable of carrying a 100 year storm. That i~ the amount of <br />water that would fall in c hundred year period is capable of <br />being ponded for a short time in that area. In the event we would <br />get that unfort.unate situation where you would hClve not only CI <br />hundred year storm, but it would rain the next day as well, which <br />.seems to be my luck lately; the water would g':> over the edge if <br />it, but would lay in the low area that would be left along the <br />park which would not cause any damage to any of the adjacent <br />properties because there is a considerable difference in elevation <br />between all these parcels including their basement in where the <br />water would be sitting here and if it came out and went in that <br />location. <br /> <br />To indicate what it might cost if an outfall or outlet is <br />ever needed, we did go into ~wo ?lternatives. The first would be <br />to build a 12 inch pipe out acrogs Owas~o and down to the lake. <br />Unfortunately that's going through a 50 foot hill which mecns that <br />cannot be open cut or we would have houses falling into the open <br />cut; so that would have to re a tunnel job which i~ very expen- <br />sive. The egtimate for that 12 inch pipe to the lake is $186,000 <br />additional cost. This is one of the reasons we didn't get too <br />excited cbout t.he idee of building an outlet for something we <br />didn't think we'd need. <br /> <br />A second alternative would be to put a storm sewer purop into <br />this location, pumping the water up during high rain-fall to the <br />top ':>f the hill where it would. run by gravity down. Even thig <br />ren $70,000 to $80,000 in cost. The calculations indicate that <br />it would not be necessary for this outfall at all by putting a <br />proper design on it. and having a seal. plus t'he fClct that CIS it <br />does go up in the area it will percolate in the :1rea without <br />causing any trouble. It's our recommendation that there not be <br />any outfall. If is ~hould prove that is needed or desired, it <br />could be done at that time, but we do not propose to expend that <br />money '",ithout the need being well demonstrated and shown. That <br />concludes the review. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I would Jike to call on the fiscal agent, <br />Mr. popovich. <br /> <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.