My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6547
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:05 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6547
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement UL-77-9 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />they should be. (Inaudible) a county road with a heavy big <br />bright light and we had to pull our shades down, but we were <br />very pleased with it because we were probably the only house <br />iR the neighborhood never vandalized or knocked off. (In- <br />aedible) out of 26 - you talk about going with the majority <br />and I think that's fine. I wish things were always that simple <br />that we could go with the majority. I think we have the respon- <br />sibility of doing all that we can to take care of vandalism or <br />robberies. If we can cut them down with the use of lights or <br />whatever means, I think it's our responsibility. I will vote <br />for the ornamental lights. There are II out of 26 (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. JOSEPH RIVARD: Fifteen out of 26. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: So - II for it and IS against it. <br /> <br />MR. RIVARD: 6 for, 5 neutral and 15 opposed. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: l4 and a half. Anyone else who wishes to <br />speak? <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: The petition came in for us to :l'eview <br />and secure a feasibility study on this proposal, which we have <br />done, and I think that when we're talking II out of 26, of if <br />you're talking of 50%, then it's going to have to be a Council <br />decision. <br /> <br />MR. JOSEPH RIVARD: There are 26 property owners there. <br />Fifteen families signed the petition opposed, and there was <br />a split in one family. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: I am very well aware of what you said, <br />but I think I have the floor now. <br /> <br />MR. RIVARD: I thought you used the wrong number. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: Eleven out of 25 or 26. <br /> <br />MR. RIVARD: Fifteen out of 26. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: I look at a petition, and when a <br />petition comes before a Council and you have 23 people that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.