My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6547
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:05 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6547
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement UL-77-9 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />sign a petition to investigate and to determine whether or not <br />it's feasible - to prepare a study costs this city a great <br />amount of money, and to drop it because the neighborhood then <br />gets together and gets pros and cons against something - (in- <br />audible) you have to throw out some of the opposition between <br />one another in this, and I'm taking this petition as it was <br />submitted to us and there were 23 names on the petition and <br />I think that any time that we can provide lighting in a com- <br />munity (inaudible). Now in most cases here. if the overhead <br />lighting is put in, it's put in at no cost to the property <br />owner, and apparently some people want the ornamental lighting <br />and I think the ornamental lighting - the neighborhood can <br />afford it and I think it should be put in. You people talk <br />about using the street as a race track. and a curvy street, <br />and cars parked on both sides of the street - I think it's <br />just a matter of time before somebody is going to get hurt <br />just because we don't have the lighting, and many of the <br />streets that you go down here in the city, and the dark streets, <br />and (inaudible) it's very difficult as a driver. you have to <br />go very slowly and cautiously for fear that somebody is going <br />to run out between those parked cars, and I particularly don't <br />care if it's overhead lighting by wires strung on them or <br />underground - I think the lighting should be put in. <br /> <br />MR. JOSEPH RIVARD: Mayor- <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: The hearing is closed. When one petition <br />comes in at the last minute, it (inaUdible) and when we find <br />out one is opposed, this is a judgment we have to sit here <br />and make. I want to remind you that a petition is (inaudible) <br />request of 35% of the home owners is the area. It doesn't have <br />to be 50%, but is (inaudible) by 35%. I happen to think - and <br />I'm going to go on record - I happen to think that lighting <br />is a deterrent to crime. I believe it. I think that what <br />happened in New York Central Park proves it. Crime went down <br />after they lit central Park. When my husband leaves town I <br />turn on every outside light I can. If I hear a noise in the <br />neighborhood all you have to do is flip that front light on <br />and it all ceases. I think at this time we're here to make <br />a judgment and I do feel that lighting is a matter of health, <br />safety, and welfare, and we will have to make our judgment on <br />that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.