My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6547
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6547
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:05 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6547
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement UL-77-9 under and pursuant to Minnesota statutes chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. LEO MEYER, 3069 Shorewood Lane: It gives me a great <br />deal of pleasure to be in favor of something. I prefer this <br />stance rather than opposing anything and everything that comes <br />along. I did not initiate the petition. However, I am heartily <br />in favor of it and I believe that lighting certainly, as is <br />evidenced in most sections of Roseville, does tend to cut down <br />on crime. In our particular area, I believe there have been <br />several break-ins - perhaps the Police Department can sub- <br />stantiate this, but from individuals I have heard of several <br />break-ins. It does get rather dark along there. There are <br />several ornamental gas lights and I understand that gas <br />lighting will be no longer a thing to be used after the end <br />of September. <br /> <br />There is another factor I think we should take into account, <br />and that is there are several widows living in that particular <br />neighborhood by themselves and lighting will be of benefit to <br />them when they come and go at night. <br /> <br />Again, Madam Mayor, I approve of the project, and even <br />if it's the overhead electrical set-up, I'm still in favor <br />of it. I believe that the one-time assessment of $49.83 is <br />very minimal for the added protection that will be given to <br />the people in the neighborhood. certainly $49.83 may seem <br />like a lot of money to some people, but I think those of us <br />that live in that neighborhood will think it's quite a bargain. <br />I think if you go out in the evening sometimes for a dinner <br />you will be paying that much or more. Thank you. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Anyone else? <br /> <br />MR. JOSEPH RIVARD, 3083 Shorewood Lane: Point of order. <br />Would you rather hear the pros before the cons? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We'll intersperse them. Am I to assume <br />you're a "con"? <br /> <br />MR. RIVARD: That's right. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Any more in favor? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.