My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6548
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:06 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6548
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. UL-77-10 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: I just want him to repeat it because <br />I couldn't hear. The door was open. Where he was going to <br />place the light. <br /> <br />MR. KRAMER: Between 2496 and 2500 Galtier Circle is where <br />the pole would be placed. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: If you wish to speak, come to the micro- <br />phone. <br /> <br />DONNA RADFORD, 2485 Galtier Circle: Presently we're <br />bordered on the north by Acorn Park and on the east by a forest <br />until Rice Street (inaudible) and there are presently no lights <br />on the street and a few of us - my husband travels a lot and <br />there is another neighbor whose husband works the graveyard <br />shift, and we would feel a lot safer if there were a light on <br />the street, so I'm in favor of it. <br /> <br />MRS. PAT MERRICK, 2486 Galtier circle: I have two children. <br />We use the cul-de-sac a lot for biking, super wheels, the whole <br />business, and we would probably use it early evening, so we <br />would be for the lighting. It would be an asset to us for <br />walking and biking in the evening, and because we have the woods <br />behind us it would be a crime to (inaudible). My family is for <br />the lighting in the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />MR. ARTHUR GODFREY, 2460 Galtier Circle: I guess the <br />basic question I want to know - is the one on Transit - is that <br />a decorative or is that the ugly kind? <br /> <br />MR. KRAMER: That' s the standard type of light. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: What would I have to do to get the decorative <br />type in? If you're going to have a decorative on the end of <br />the cul-de-sac, it would be ridiculous to put one of those on <br />the other end. <br /> <br />MR. KRAMER: When you speak of decorative, are you talking <br />about the pole itself? <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: The square one or the round type. <br /> <br />MR, KRAMER: The round one, and that will be on the orna- <br />mental light also. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.