My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6548
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:06 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6548
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. UL-77-10 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. GODFREY: What type is it? <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Is it the old creosote type or (inaudible) <br />been bored for wiring. <br /> <br />MR. DOUG STRONG, City Public Works Department: The one at <br />the end of the cul-de-sac is a cored pole and not a creosote, <br />but a treated type of pole, that's a nicer looking pole. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Does it have the rough junk on it. <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: That's smooth. The one at this end is your <br />standard power pole. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: That's what I don't want. How do we go <br />about getting the decorative at this end. <br /> <br />MR. KRAMER: That's what you have now. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: We don't have a pole. There's one on Galtier <br />Street. This is Galtier Circle. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN HESS: I imagine you really have to re-petition <br />for an ornamental pole at that end also. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: How would I go about getting a new hearing, <br />because if I'm in this position now and you vote on it, I'm <br />dead, right. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: That is one that the city puts up and that <br />would not have to be put up. We could proceed with this - <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: The cost factor is moving in and moving out. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: I think the cost factor would be spread <br />over all of the benefited lots and it would be better to do at <br />one time rather than put in one pole and then go back, because <br />I think the project should be done at one time so an even <br />assessment is spread against all of the benefited property. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: I have another question then. At this <br />particular time, if the majority of the people on that block <br />are here, could it be taken care of this way - through a "yes", <br />"no" vote of us instead of a written petition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.