My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6548
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:06 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:53:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6548
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. UL-77-10 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
9/12/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. STRONG: This pole could be the core type pole and <br />(inaudible) such as Shorewood Lane. The pre~ious hearing was <br />taken care of with the installation charge versus this light <br />which is the ornamental light that is a higher charge because <br />it's being served by an underground system - the only way it can <br />be served. This can be served by overhead or underground. <br />Northern states Power policy now on this type of pole, if we <br />request, they could bury it and have the installation charge. <br />The report does not have that. <br /> <br />MR. ROBERT BELL, City Attorney: You can increase the cost <br />a little. All the notices - (inaudible) you put in two orna- <br />mental poles (inaudible) put them in and order them in tonight. <br />Just a question of another pole - increase the cost and not <br />adding any more assessment. <br /> <br />MR. PETERSON: I concur. <br /> <br />MR. BELL: You're not adding any more lots. <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: There are two or three lots across the street <br />that were not sent notices. They do benefit. <br /> <br />MR. BELL: The only people you're going to assess (in- <br />audible) that didn't get a notice, you would have to send them <br />a notice. What is the greater assessment (inaudible) from this <br />to the other. <br /> <br />MR. STRONG: We didn't get a cost from Northern States <br />Power. They have to go out and do a study on where they're <br />coming from - where the buried lines are. It (inaudible) cost <br />to come from a power source, and with the fancier pole - and <br />we didn't get the cost. <br /> <br />MR, KRAMER: We'd have to go back to Northern States Power <br />and ask for an additional study and additional cost. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: The power source is there. <br /> <br />MR. GODFREY: We have all buried cables. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: This would not be, so that's why they don't <br />have the cost. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.