My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6588
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:10 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:54:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6588
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-77-24 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/29/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. RODMAN: That might all well be. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: But this is the point the Council <br />took. Now each time that a petition comes before the Council, <br />the Council will have to sit and go through this entire pro- <br />cedure because we didn't have the support when we had the <br />foresight to lay it out to the people to approve it. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: First of all, we could not put it in and <br />put it totally on the tax rolls. We must assess at least <br />20% by Minnesota state law, so there's no way we can do what <br />you asked. I would say the Cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis <br />have done this by going to the legislature and getting spe- <br />cial laws. Furthermore, they are using what is called <br />community development funds, and not the tax dollar for that <br />purpose, so we could not do what you just asked. <br /> <br />MR. RODMAN: I understand that, but I have some further <br />thoughts on this, and I think one of the things I don't like <br />is the manner in which it has been handled. Evidentally this <br />is somebody's pet project and there's just been pressure put <br />on people. Even called up - a guy from the village hall <br />called me - offered me this if I'd sign this (inaudible) <br />petition. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: I want to let you know there's no <br />pressure from the City Council to put a street in the City <br />of Roseville. I resent what you just said that this must <br />be a pet project. <br /> <br />MR. RODMAN: Not of yours, but you seem to be bothered <br />a hell of a lot. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN CURLEY: You're bothered. And I resent <br />your saying it's a City Council pet project. <br /> <br />MR. RODMAN: I said it's somebody's. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: If it's anybody's, it's the 57% <br />that petitioned on Ryan. <br /> <br />MR. RODMAN: It's not 57%. You haven't got any 57%. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.