My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6588
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6500
>
res_6588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:10 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:54:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6588
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-P-77-24 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
11/29/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. GEORGE MOONEY, 1986 North Lexington: It isn't clear <br />to me why they should be alone - not that I'm particularly <br />concerned. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Because it will cost them about $300 a lot <br />more if they go together. We can only assess 10% of the lots <br />on Oxford. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: <br />we going to do it. <br /> <br />Now, are we going to let Oxford go or are <br />Is there a motion for that. <br /> <br />MRS. GEORGE MOONEY, 1986 <br />if you don't vote for Oxford? <br />thing with our lot sometime. <br />do something? <br /> <br />North Lexington: What happens <br />Obviously we want to do some- <br />What happens when we do want to <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: First of all, let me ask. Can we consider <br />the water alone on Oxford? What else do we need on there? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: You mean in the way of facilities to make <br />it a buildable lot? The water and services for water and <br />sewer. They have sewer mains in the street but no services <br />to the lot. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We could approve those services for Oxford <br />alone. Those services could be put in, and I believe it would <br />be highly unlikely that the other lots who now have services <br />would be assessed for that. That's the way I feel. That would <br />be voted on by another Council but I would find any Council <br />(inaudible) hard to believe that they would do it, but then <br />you'd have just a temporary street put down in front of your <br />property. <br /> <br />MR. MOONEY: I don't know whether I understand correctly or <br />not, but I say that I'm for improving Oxford from Shryer as <br />shown here, and I understand - I don't want to speak for Mr. Cave <br />- but unless I'm mistaken, he has no objectiDn to it and if 1031 <br />has no objection to it, I don't know why it shouldn't be consid- <br />ered. I could be wrong. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.