Laserfiche WebLink
<br />because that's work that would be done in the right-of-way. <br /> <br />MR. CONNORS: Then back to the first statement. The <br />contractor for our area had that for an expense and he <br />charged that to every person in the area, and whoever is <br />developing the property should aSSUMe that cost also. I <br />signed a petition for Ryan Avenue. I'm against the project <br />as it stands. I'm against the whole project as it stands <br />because I do not see anybody improving Ryan without Oxford <br />because they're saying we have to get the payment for Dxford. <br /> <br />There is one other thing wrong, and maybe you can tell <br />me. You come up with some footage. Could you tell me - <br />this 1975 number here - is that included on Oxford or Ryan? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: It's Oxford. <br /> <br />MR. CONNORS: That's 143. Mr. Mooney is 140. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: That's only 10%. <br /> <br />MR. CONNORS: Why? That's on Oxford. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Simply consider Oxford by itself. That <br />number 1975 there that you see - the 143 feet - the frontage <br />of that was on Ryan. The side of the lot is on Oxford and <br />our side lot policy - it's only 10% of the distance that be- <br />comes assessable, so the 143 feet becomes 14 feet of assess- <br />ment. <br /> <br />MR. CONNORS: Then if you're going to tack $3.50 per <br />front foot on Ryan Avenue, which you call Ryan Avenue North, <br />why don't you tack $3.50 on everybody that lives on Ryan South <br />and everybody on Shryer also because they're just as close to <br />Oxford as the people on Ryan Avenue Nor~h. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I understand your question. The answer <br />is there's no improvement this can be assigned to. If it <br />were being done by (inaudible) that would happen. In that <br />case we wouldn't be talking $3.50 - it would be a (inaudible) <br />because there would be a bigger area. In aBswer to the other <br />