My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_6677
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
06xxx
>
6600
>
res_6677
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:10:21 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 11:56:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
6677
Resolution Title
Ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS-W-ST-P-78-16 under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
7/10/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />in the original package. This is the extreme west end of the <br />project over at this end near me, with this being the St. Anthony - <br />Roseville border. In red is a proposal to relocate an existing <br />privately owned water line, and in doing so, some of the proper- <br />ties that do not already get served by water would receive this <br />facility and would be assessed. Also, it's hard to see, but <br />tilis yellow, there are some extensions of the sanitary sewer <br />system to the westerly lots in Roseville that now don't have <br />sewer available. This would be assessed. The areas in green <br />are storm drainage, and maybe I can continue this map on the <br />other half. You can see it continues all the way over to 35-W. <br />This storm drainage, again, was originally anticipated to be <br />paid by the county entirely, but as this has been reviewed by <br />the statev they have found by using a standard procedure of <br />allocating (inaudible) that the city will have to participate in. <br />We're working with the county to see if the standard procedures <br />being modified so most of the assessments that may be involved <br />in this may be assumed by the county and state aid funds. It <br />has not been resolved at this time, but the technical people <br />involved are agreed. <br /> <br />The last is curb and gutter which is shown in light brown <br />that goes the entire length of the roadway. <br /> <br />t1AYOR DEHOS: Could we close the door there? It's getting <br />difficult to hear in here. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The actual roadway would be 52 feet wide, <br />or 4-lane, and as part of the construction there would be traffic <br />signals installed at Walnut and Lonq Lake Road, with the city <br />participating in these expenses, but not as assessments. The <br />county may wish to add considerable detail to this, or not. I <br />will leave it to their discretion. <br /> <br />[,m. WAYNE LEONARD, County Engineer's Department and coordi- <br />nating engineer~ As Hr. Honchell has said, the details of the <br />road have been presented before. I do have a complete set of <br />plans which have been on file here with the city. I have some <br />colored exhibits which I will be happy to put up and review if <br />there's sufficient interest. <br /> <br />I think what I would like to get into first is to go back <br />to the fact that County Road C is a County State Aid Highway <br />which means it's part of our system of roads in the county which <br />is primarily supported by gas tax moneys. <br /> <br />The original improvement that was proposed was approved by <br />this Council in a feasibility report, and the right-of-way plan <br />was approved for the acquiSition of right-of-way. ~ith that, <br />we proceeded to get funds out of our gas tax funds for the <br />right-of-way acquisition, had the right-of-way plans submitted <br />to the appraisers, (inaudible) made, offers made to the property <br />owners, and neqotiations were started. As a result of that, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.