Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />We're not saying that's going to happen but we feel it's a much <br />better decision at this point to put the utilities in than it is to <br />tear that street up perhaps within three to five years. If those <br />added utility services are put in, then they would also be <br />assessable although inasmuch as they are not needed by the property <br />at this point, we, as a staff, would probably recommend actual <br />deferment of those assessments until they are used by the property <br />owner. That's a decision for the next hearing if this goes <br />forward. <br /> <br />This portion of the project then would result in no assessments <br />to anyone for the paving or the pathway except for the church parcel <br />and the only services that would be assessed are to the extreme <br />easterly lot. <br /> <br />The portion of the project that is assessable and does affect <br />many of the parcels, however, is the storm sewer portion. The <br />other improvements either had all of the storm sewer in place <br />or had much of it that could be drained and was relatively small in <br />nature as far as drainage. In order to construct C-2, however, <br />the entire westerly portion from Pascal to Snelling currently is <br />without drainage. It simply runs on the road and wherever it can <br />go to. We feel this is one of the factors that has accelerated <br />the deterioration of the roadway. It's a flat roadway and the <br />water sets and goes down under - the road gets wet in the summer <br />and (inaudible) and thaws. We feel very strongly that there's a <br />definite strong need to have a storm sewer system to properly <br />drain that roadway. We're proposing to build that from Pascal to <br />where the state project begins. The state, as part of their project, <br />will continue that storm system, pick up their own drainage and take <br />it down as what's shown as green in this slide to the pond in the <br />Coventry area and into an outlet there. This will be discussed <br />in another meeting before the Council in the future. Many of <br />the side streets - residential streets immediately north, however, <br />drain southerly so that they are also bringing water down to C-2 <br />which compounds the problem. Lydia Street is roughly (inaudible) <br />which is just a little ways north of where the boundary is and I <br />will say everything within this solid black line is proposed to be <br />assessed as part of this project- because that's where our preliminary <br />investigations sh9w the break point is between water that flows <br />north and water that flows south and the system used in Roseville is <br />that if you have water that comes down to a facility then you're <br />contributing to the problem. In a like manner, it's felt fair <br />that you contribute some of the monetary expense. <br /> <br />We're proposing to extend storm sewers part way up each <br />of these four roadways and intercept the water corning down these <br />roads with catch basins. On those roads we would only be con- <br />structing on only one side of the road. We would be replacing any <br />pavement that has to be removed as part of this work, again, with <br />